| 00:06:20 | * | xtr00_ quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 00:44:11 | * | hazardchem quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 00:44:20 | * | hazardchem joined #nim |
| 00:45:59 | * | sdothum quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
| 00:48:25 | * | sdothum joined #nim |
| 03:17:52 | * | rockcavera quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 03:28:58 | * | SchweinDeBurg joined #nim |
| 04:58:20 | * | jj quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 05:22:40 | * | jj joined #nim |
| 06:22:26 | * | mal`` quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
| 06:34:16 | * | mal`` joined #nim |
| 07:39:36 | FromDiscord | <b0rsuk> Oh, it's a finite sequence, so technically it's simple to write an O(1) solution and it won't be large. Unless you want Armstrong Numbers in other numeric bases as well. |
| 07:40:38 | FromDiscord | <b0rsuk> And there are a few quirks, such as when an Armstrong number ends in 0 then the next number will also be an Armstrong number. |
| 07:41:04 | FromDiscord | <pmunch> In reply to @longptr "Is Nim <--> wxWidgets": Not really, I don't think the wkWidgets bindings I used are still maintained. And Futhark unfortunately doesn't wrap C++ (yet) |
| 07:41:42 | FromDiscord | <pmunch> I'm actually planning on using WxWidgets as the target for the C++ wrapping effort in Futhark |
| 07:45:20 | FromDiscord | <pmunch> In reply to @b0rsuk "Oh, it's a *finite*": With 89 numbers no less, so you could just slap the ones that fit in an int into an array and iterate over them 😂 |
| 07:45:55 | FromDiscord | <b0rsuk> Now I'm starting to think about balanced ternary. (1, 0, -1) |
| 08:29:07 | * | xtr00 joined #nim |
| 12:06:06 | * | xet7 quit (Ping timeout: 249 seconds) |
| 12:19:16 | * | xet7 joined #nim |
| 12:19:50 | * | jarausch_ joined #nim |
| 12:54:58 | * | sdothum quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 12:58:36 | * | sdothum joined #nim |