00:12:10 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` I'll see, I'll give it a look over the week. |
01:33:30 | * | xkapastel joined #nim |
01:36:47 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> hrm - anyone around that has knowledge of the Nim VM? |
01:38:48 | * | tiorock joined #nim |
01:38:48 | * | rockcavera quit (Killed (wilhelm.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))) |
01:38:48 | * | tiorock is now known as rockcavera |
01:58:31 | * | MJCaley quit (Quit: MJCaley) |
02:09:19 | * | S1tiSchu joined #nim |
02:13:06 | * | S1t1Schu quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
02:15:32 | * | arnetheduck joined #nim |
02:32:05 | * | d10n-work quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
03:08:30 | * | arnetheduck quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
03:10:35 | * | arnetheduck joined #nim |
03:17:09 | * | SenasOzys quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
03:28:01 | * | vlad1777d quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
03:29:37 | * | endragor joined #nim |
03:36:10 | * | tiorock joined #nim |
03:36:10 | * | tiorock quit (Changing host) |
03:36:10 | * | tiorock joined #nim |
03:36:10 | * | rockcavera is now known as Guest37660 |
03:36:10 | * | Guest37660 quit (Killed (rajaniemi.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services))) |
03:36:10 | * | tiorock is now known as rockcavera |
04:54:19 | * | Snircle quit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com) |
05:02:12 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
05:13:48 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
05:14:21 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
05:50:04 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
05:53:08 | * | nsf joined #nim |
05:58:20 | * | xet7 quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
06:26:10 | * | dddddd quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
06:29:43 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
07:08:43 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
07:22:15 | * | solitudesf joined #nim |
07:50:09 | * | Vladar joined #nim |
07:57:53 | * | far4ia4650 quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
08:01:14 | * | far4ia4650 joined #nim |
08:10:45 | * | PMunch joined #nim |
08:29:37 | * | SenasOzys joined #nim |
08:32:22 | * | SenasOzys quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
08:32:52 | * | yglukhov quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
08:33:09 | * | SenasOzys joined #nim |
08:34:03 | * | SenasOzys quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
08:42:41 | * | solitudesf quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
08:44:50 | * | solitudesf joined #nim |
08:57:32 | * | sendell joined #nim |
08:58:48 | * | solitudesf quit (Quit: solitudesf) |
09:04:43 | * | solitudesf joined #nim |
09:05:24 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
09:19:56 | * | rokups joined #nim |
09:24:23 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
09:28:59 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
09:37:44 | livcd | I am kinda disappointed by Manning |
09:39:45 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
09:45:01 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
09:49:23 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
09:51:41 | PMunch | livcd, how so? |
09:55:43 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
09:59:45 | * | onionhammer1 quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
10:05:38 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
10:07:20 | livcd | PMunch: they are not replying to e-mails about bad formatting in some of the book ...for months |
10:10:09 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
10:26:15 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
10:30:30 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
10:35:13 | * | floppydh quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
10:36:49 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
10:37:39 | * | couven92 joined #nim |
10:42:48 | PMunch | Ouch, yeah that's no good |
10:42:58 | * | xkapastel quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
10:47:42 | * | Amun_Ra quit (Quit: brb) |
10:51:53 | * | Amun_Ra joined #nim |
11:02:04 | * | dmi0 joined #nim |
11:04:21 | * | onionhammer1 joined #nim |
11:06:54 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> how I can return a json response using jester? |
11:07:31 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
11:07:56 | * | floppydh quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
11:08:11 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> I tried something like ⏎ ⏎ ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9e769b8f1c77ef3a8b166c] |
11:08:48 | PMunch | And that didn't work? |
11:08:55 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> nop :/ |
11:09:00 | PMunch | Error? |
11:09:08 | PMunch | You might have to call $ on it |
11:09:45 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
11:10:07 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9e770fe4ff28713afd2ac6] |
11:10:52 | PMunch | Yeah |
11:10:58 | PMunch | That's a type mismatch |
11:11:18 | PMunch | http://ix.io/TfE/nim |
11:11:20 | PMunch | That works |
11:11:54 | PMunch | Note the explicit $ call on line 6 to convert the JSON to a string |
11:12:01 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
11:12:03 | * | vlad1777d joined #nim |
11:13:44 | PMunch | dom96, maybe it would be nice to have a resp variant in Jester that took JSON data and set the Content-Type header to "application/json" |
11:15:32 | Araq | yeah, seems such a common thing |
11:16:49 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9e78a16fba1a703ad408d1] |
11:17:00 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> my response: ⏎ ⏎ ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9e78ac35dd17022e28c3fa] |
11:19:01 | Araq | echo (1, 2, 3) |
11:19:04 | Araq | vs |
11:19:07 | Araq | echo(1, 2, 3) |
11:19:15 | Araq | the first passes a tuple to 'echo' |
11:19:25 | Araq | the second calls echo with 3 arguments |
11:19:45 | Araq | probably the Nim tutorials should highlight this difference |
11:19:45 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> :O |
11:20:35 | Araq | the error message says 'tuple of' explicitly though, maybe read the error message ;-) |
11:21:30 | FromGitter | <Bennyelg> thanks. |
11:22:00 | PMunch | Oh and Bennyelg, I think contentType wraps it in the Content-Type header itself, so you should either change it to contentType: "application/json" or to headers: [("Content-Type", "application/json"")] |
11:22:37 | Araq | I could it make it more chatty so that you can then ignore even more of it... we can't win the fight against the non-readers. and I'm not blaming you at all, I prefer to not read things myself too. |
11:27:29 | * | floppydh quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
11:28:09 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
11:29:19 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
11:32:17 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
11:35:22 | * | Amun_Ra quit (Quit: Gdyby mi się chciało tak jak mi się nie chce...) |
11:35:47 | * | Amun_Ra joined #nim |
11:43:52 | federico3 | urgh... that's very error prone |
11:44:56 | PMunch | The whole echo () vs echo() thing? |
11:45:20 | federico3 | yep |
11:45:30 | PMunch | Yeah, but I wouldn't want to be without it.. |
11:46:00 | federico3 | do you use "procname (...)" often? |
11:46:23 | PMunch | No but I use "procname 10" a lot |
11:46:30 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Not sure if I know of a language, that has `name (args)` syntax with space, hadn't noticed at least |
11:46:33 | federico3 | that's different |
11:46:34 | PMunch | Not often you would pass a tuple to something in that way |
11:46:44 | PMunch | brb |
11:47:28 | FromGitter | <survivorm> Personally, i'd warn user on that |
11:47:49 | FromGitter | <survivorm> not error, but seing it as error prone as it is... |
11:48:07 | FromGitter | <survivorm> it's better be reformulated |
11:48:12 | federico3 | survivorm: yep. "foo a" where a is a tuple is ok, but when "foo (..." trigger a type error a special warning could be printed out |
11:48:22 | * | MJCaley joined #nim |
11:48:40 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> I guess "Did you mean .." message wouldn't do too much harm. Might make the error noiser, but maybe it's fine here |
11:48:45 | * | dmi0_ joined #nim |
11:48:46 | FromGitter | <survivorm> i agree on that 😄 |
11:49:39 | PMunch | It would be interesting if we could call procedures by passing them a tuple with it's arguments.. |
11:49:41 | FromGitter | <survivorm> cause situation there foo tuple is incorrect is better yet |
11:49:43 | federico3 | not much noisier when is triggered only by the "foo (" pattern |
11:49:47 | PMunch | Probably a horrible idea, but would be interesting |
11:50:17 | PMunch | I mean the error message is pretty clear |
11:50:29 | federico3 | PMunch: you mean like python's foo(*list_of_args, **dict_of_keyword_args) ? |
11:50:29 | PMunch | You passed a tuple but I expected these options |
11:50:31 | FromGitter | <survivorm> than situation then you're actually CAN do a foo tuple, but DON't want to |
11:51:35 | FromGitter | <survivorm> I'd say passing foo (tuple) should be considered bad practice, anyway |
11:51:39 | * | dmi0 quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) |
11:51:48 | PMunch | survivorm, well the tuple would have to match typewise obviously. So that would likely seldom occur, but you can always use "procname((<tuple goes here>)) to call it with the tuple as the first argument |
11:52:10 | FromGitter | <survivorm> if you want to, you'd better use foo((tuple)) |
11:52:17 | PMunch | survivorm, yeah foo (tuple) should indeed be considered bad practice as it's confusing |
11:52:31 | FromGitter | <jaco60> so enforce use of parenthesis in proc call ? |
11:52:33 | FromGitter | <survivorm> And i think it should be strict |
11:52:38 | FromGitter | <survivorm> no |
11:52:41 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Gah, I keep naming proc arguments as `func` and being confused by weird compiler errors, because my editor doesn't highlight it as keyword |
11:52:46 | FromGitter | <survivorm> only in this situation |
11:52:48 | PMunch | jaco60, but only for tuples? That's confusing :P |
11:53:03 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> It doesn't even say that func is deprecated, just that i'm missing some `)` |
11:53:03 | FromGitter | <jaco60> No, in all cases |
11:53:34 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @jaco60 I don't think everyone will agree on that |
11:53:41 | FromGitter | <jaco60> i’m not :) |
11:53:46 | PMunch | I don't agree |
11:53:49 | FromGitter | <jaco60> i’m a Haskell fan :) |
11:53:56 | FromGitter | <survivorm> and, besides, it's not wthat we want |
11:53:58 | PMunch | (((((())))))) |
11:54:10 | PMunch | There you go jaco60 :P |
11:54:18 | PMunch | Some extra brackets for you |
11:54:19 | FromGitter | <survivorm> we want a situation to be clear |
11:54:36 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Dunno, I kind of like no parantheis procedure call. For example, in macro it's more readable when I use `newIdentNode "someIdent"` instead of using parenthesis |
11:54:49 | PMunch | I like Clojure though so I'm not really the right person to mock you for that :P |
11:54:53 | FromGitter | <survivorm> and it will be if we are to throw error on foo (...) constructs |
11:55:09 | federico3 | why throwing error if the construct is valid? |
11:55:13 | FromGitter | <survivorm> and only then |
11:55:19 | PMunch | An error is a bit strict |
11:55:26 | PMunch | Yeah, why throw an error if it's valid |
11:55:52 | federico3 | a more explicit warning is enough - to be printed only if there's a type error |
11:55:57 | FromGitter | <survivorm> Because it may lead to bad consequences. And warnings are seldom read |
11:56:23 | dom96 | There already is an error? |
11:56:26 | PMunch | I think it would be very rare for this to lead to bad consequences that wouldn't be caught by the type checking |
11:56:32 | dom96 | You get a type mismatch error on this |
11:56:35 | FromGitter | <survivorm> that warrants only a simple change |
11:56:37 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> I mean, error will be thrown in most cases anyway. Just have to add message like "Did you mean to call procedure?" or something |
11:56:50 | PMunch | dom96, yeah, but they want to add a hint on what you did wrong |
11:57:04 | federico3 | dom96: the current error message does not hint on the whitespace |
11:57:32 | dom96 | yes, in general we need a better error system in Nim |
11:57:32 | PMunch | If you have a mismatch with a tuple it could add an extra "are you trying to do <this> while meaning to do <that>" |
11:57:58 | dom96 | With hints that explain possible steps to fix the problem |
11:58:09 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @PMunch don't use word rare. In programming unforseen consequences are everythere. Even if the error situation is supposed to happen NEVER, not only rare |
11:58:37 | FromGitter | <survivorm> Safe is better than sorry |
11:58:43 | * | MJCaley quit (Quit: MJCaley) |
11:59:44 | PMunch | Well, you don't want to end up like this: http://www.breachbangclear.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/too_safe003.jpg |
11:59:59 | federico3 | survivorm: perhaps refactoring "foo (..)" into "foo((...))" could be a task for a code formatter yet to happen |
12:00:11 | FromGitter | <survivorm> Remember lessons of the Halflife (about the things that shoud not have been happend never :)) |
12:00:56 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @federico3 That's WRONG. Cause it requires a user input |
12:01:04 | dom96 | There is a lot of things in Nim that fall under the "it feels like it could cause issues in the future" |
12:01:09 | dom96 | Like style insensitivity |
12:01:23 | federico3 | survivorm: huh? |
12:01:29 | FromGitter | <survivorm> it may be translated to foo(xx) or to foo((xx)) |
12:01:45 | dom96 | It's annoying because a lot of people decide to dismiss Nim because of these things |
12:01:54 | FromGitter | <survivorm> And program doesn't know which one is correct |
12:02:46 | * | Snircle joined #nim |
12:02:51 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @dom96 More like they are cautious of this issues, so decide against investigating |
12:03:17 | federico3 | survivorm: the tool reformats only if there is no ambiguity around types |
12:03:17 | FromGitter | <survivorm> Less such things, more interested people |
12:03:27 | FromGitter | <jaco60> i admit these spacing things disturbed me when i first met Nim |
12:04:29 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @federico3 that might help. And might not. There may be two errors at a place just as easily as one |
12:04:52 | FromGitter | <survivorm> False-positive results are the worst |
12:05:31 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
12:05:37 | federico3 | survivorm: also, you could be able to configure the formatter to be more or less strict |
12:06:21 | federico3 | e.g. avoid guesswork and throw an error on unclear syntax |
12:06:44 | FromGitter | <survivorm> @federico3. People rarely read manuals. And people rarely patch default configs. Sad, but true |
12:07:11 | FromGitter | <survivorm> So the default shoud be as strict as it may be |
12:07:35 | FromGitter | <survivorm> And the changes must be made on the own risk |
12:08:01 | federico3 | survivorm: if it's an external formatter tool it can ship with strict defaults without changing the language itself |
12:15:06 | Araq | that spacing change was part of an RFC and it makes the language more consistent and easier to work with |
12:16:02 | * | floppydh quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
12:16:20 | Araq | "it might cause trouble" continues to be the least convincing argument you can come up with. |
12:16:55 | Araq | we use the scientific method here instead, where we change stuff based on "it really did cause trouble" |
12:17:09 | Araq | like the unary < |
12:18:10 | Araq | which is annoying enough, having to rewrite my code all the time because somebody somewhere had a bug. |
12:18:51 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
12:20:27 | Araq | besides the spacing is natural, f [1] # pass an array to f, f[1] # array access |
12:20:57 | Araq | in C we have #define foo(a) vs #define foo (a) |
12:26:00 | Yardanico | https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/6600#issuecomment-370760846 https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/6999#issuecomment-370761180 :( |
12:26:51 | * | vlad1777d quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
12:33:46 | federico3 | :( |
12:41:14 | * | dmi0__ joined #nim |
12:43:39 | * | dmi0_ quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
12:46:11 | * | endragor quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
12:47:17 | * | yglukhov quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
12:58:07 | * | floppydh quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
13:00:30 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
13:04:17 | * | Vladar quit (Quit: Leaving) |
13:11:48 | * | rustomax joined #nim |
13:29:13 | dom96 | hrm, do we have something like this? https://twitter.com/_inside/status/970746679275159553 |
13:29:18 | dom96 | The `canImport` specifically |
13:30:55 | Araq | fileExists works at compile-time iirc |
13:31:07 | * | endragor joined #nim |
13:31:21 | Araq | so it should be possible |
13:31:44 | PMunch | Well, then you'd have to implement the module lookup logic manualy |
13:31:56 | dom96 | yeah |
13:32:00 | Araq | yeah :-) |
13:32:16 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> does `when compiles(import foo)` work? |
13:32:21 | PMunch | It would be cool to have it use the same code-path as for imports, just excluding the last step which is actually loading the module |
13:32:47 | Araq | andreaferretti, oh I need to try |
13:34:27 | Araq | nope :-) |
13:34:30 | Araq | template imp(x) = |
13:34:30 | Araq | import x |
13:34:31 | Araq | when compiles(imp(strutils)): |
13:34:32 | Araq | imp strutils |
13:34:34 | Araq | echo "abc".toUpperAscii |
13:34:36 | Araq | else: |
13:34:38 | Araq | echo "meh" |
13:36:04 | PMunch | Hmm, that does neither echo ABC nor meh for me.. |
13:36:22 | * | dmi0__ quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
13:37:01 | PMunch | Oh wait, it does it at runtime |
13:38:03 | Araq | internally it produces Error: 'import' is only allowed at top level |
13:38:13 | Araq | so that's why the 'compiles' fails |
13:38:54 | Araq | which is weird ... |
13:39:39 | Araq | ah no it needs to open a new scope so that symbol table changes can be rolled back... |
13:39:48 | Araq | hacky. |
13:40:44 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> hmmm, why does template also includes docstring? Kind of annoying, when I want it to be just one statement, but have some documentation |
13:40:54 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Kind of have to use macro now |
13:41:12 | Araq | well docstrings are part of the AST |
13:41:25 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Yeah, it does make sense, but slighltly inconvinient |
13:41:31 | Araq | macros need to be able to influence them |
13:41:40 | PMunch | They are? |
13:41:46 | Araq | yup. |
13:42:01 | PMunch | I just assumed they weren't, that's great news for my protobuf implementation |
13:42:06 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> IF they weren't it would be more annoying to create doc generating tools |
13:42:48 | Araq | system.compiles is under-specified |
13:44:08 | Araq | if it weren't for the scope my compiles(imp(x)) would work :D |
13:44:38 | PMunch | Hmm, why doesn't dumpTree show the docstring? |
13:45:05 | dom96 | asserts are still giving me incorrect stack traces in my program... |
13:45:10 | dom96 | (that compiles to cpp) |
13:45:43 | Araq | StmtList |
13:45:43 | Araq | CommentStmt |
13:45:53 | dom96 | https://gist.github.com/dom96/44409c8133359eaa591a946792fc16b9 |
13:45:54 | Araq | ^ PMunch, it kinda does |
13:45:57 | dom96 | Here is the strange stack trace |
13:46:37 | Araq | dom96: does that have anything to do with C++ though? |
13:46:51 | Araq | I bet for the C target it would be the same |
13:47:29 | dom96 | Well, I can't test it on the C target anymore |
13:47:36 | dom96 | but back when I could it only happened in the C++ backend |
13:48:27 | PMunch | Araq, ah my bad. I was looking for the string I had added :P |
13:49:30 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
13:50:57 | * | rustomax quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
13:52:54 | * | aziz joined #nim |
13:53:37 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
13:54:35 | PMunch | Hmm, when is documentation generated from something like that though? |
13:55:11 | PMunch | I've tried creating a macro that outputs a proc with a docstring and call it, but running "nim jsondoc2" on it generates an empty result.. |
14:00:49 | * | athenot joined #nim |
14:01:33 | * | rustomax joined #nim |
14:01:34 | * | rustomax quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
14:10:08 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
14:10:25 | Araq | give the proc an export marker |
14:13:41 | PMunch | Aha! |
14:13:45 | PMunch | That's great! |
14:14:49 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
14:18:16 | FromGitter | <narimiran> @dom96 i'm trying to install (choose)nim on windows, and i downloaded latest choosenim release for windows (choosenim-0.3.2_windows_i386.zip). is this 32-bit version? |
14:18:33 | dom96 | yes |
14:18:54 | * | aziz quit (Quit: Ex-Chat) |
14:19:18 | Araq | ok, I made 'canImport' work |
14:19:41 | FromGitter | <narimiran> would that explain "out of memory" notifications i've been getting when trying to run something that works on my linux machine? |
14:19:55 | Araq | certainly |
14:20:10 | Araq | on 32bits you can't use more than 3GB on Windows |
14:20:45 | Araq | why do we have so many users with programs that eat memory like no tomorrow? |
14:21:33 | FromGitter | <narimiran> because i'm doing some numerical computations with a domain of 100 space-steps and 500,000 time-steps? ;) |
14:22:01 | Araq | what did you do in the 90ies then? :P |
14:22:36 | FromGitter | <narimiran> went to elementary school and play on my 486 |
14:23:53 | FromGitter | <narimiran> is there some other way (as easy as choosenim) to install nim to a windows machine on which i don't have admin privileges? |
14:24:09 | Araq | unzip the file and run finish.exe |
14:24:43 | FromGitter | <narimiran> btw, is there a reason why there are no 64-bit releases of choosenim for windows, @dom96? |
14:24:48 | Araq | https://nim-lang.org/download/nim-0.18.0_x64.zip |
14:25:17 | dom96 | narimiran: Lack of time |
14:26:17 | FromGitter | <narimiran> @Araq will try that. i thought it is more complicated than that! :) |
14:26:42 | FromGitter | <narimiran> should i uninstall choosenim-version first? |
14:27:02 | Araq | I think so, not sure. |
14:27:17 | FromGitter | <narimiran> @Araq finish.exe can't be run without admin privileges :( |
14:27:29 | Araq | lol what? |
14:27:39 | dom96 | You don't have to uninstall choosenim |
14:27:59 | Araq | I don't even test it with admin privs |
14:28:12 | Araq | fix your security setting maybe? |
14:28:32 | FromGitter | <narimiran> oh, it wanted MY password, not admin's |
14:28:52 | dom96 | Why does it want your password? 0_o |
14:29:06 | Araq | yeah, never heard that one before |
14:29:24 | FromGitter | <narimiran> @dom96 because it is "protecting me" or whatever windows popup has just said.... |
14:29:42 | dom96 | oh, is this Windows 10's thing? |
14:29:50 | Araq | that's now how Windows 10 works |
14:29:52 | FromGitter | <narimiran> it's the first time i see this screen.... |
14:29:55 | FromGitter | <narimiran> win 8.1 |
14:30:19 | Araq | screenshot! :-) |
14:30:46 | euantor | probably can't do an actual screenshot if it's UAC |
14:30:46 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
14:31:11 | Araq | UAC doesn't ask for a password |
14:31:15 | euantor | I'd guess this is a machine ona domain and you don't have domain admin privileges |
14:31:23 | euantor | It does if you set it up to do so |
14:31:25 | * | birdspider joined #nim |
14:31:47 | Araq | ok, I have never set it up to do so and it's not the default |
14:32:14 | FromGitter | <narimiran> screenshot coming up :) |
14:32:18 | euantor | yeah, it's not default for administrator accounts. it is for user accounts I believe |
14:32:25 | Araq | confused me when I first used Linux :-) |
14:32:42 | euantor | you can modify it in secpol.msc |
14:32:44 | Araq | "what the ...? I have not forgotten my pw, thanks" |
14:33:04 | Araq | "why do you keep asking me about my pw? I used it to login" |
14:33:05 | FromGitter | <narimiran> https://i.imgur.com/JnGh8KA.png |
14:33:29 | dom96 | yep, "SmartScreen" |
14:33:31 | euantor | oh, that's smart screen rather than UAC. it's because the binary isn't signed |
14:33:54 | Araq | and choosenim.exe is signed? |
14:34:37 | FromGitter | <narimiran> choosenim.exe - the same thing. so i downloaded .zip and that didn't bring up this screen |
14:34:59 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
14:36:07 | Araq | just let Windows 8 die :P |
14:38:16 | FromGitter | <narimiran> wooohooo, this works!! |
14:38:36 | FromGitter | <narimiran> now i can freely use my enormous program :) |
14:38:44 | dom96 | choosenim gets around this by using a .bat script :P |
14:38:59 | dom96 | and then using it via the terminal doesn't trigger SmartScreen |
14:39:22 | dom96 | Araq: Pretty sure Windows 10 has this too |
14:39:40 | Araq | dom96: never seen it in my life |
14:39:54 | * | salewski joined #nim |
14:39:57 | FromGitter | <narimiran> now i need to find how to easily measure elapsed time.... too used to use linux tools |
14:40:18 | dom96 | You've probably disabled it or something |
14:40:21 | Araq | nimble install nimbench |
14:41:03 | Araq | dom96: how can I disable what I am unaware of? |
14:41:32 | dom96 | Maybe you've turned down the security settings |
14:41:42 | FromGitter | <narimiran> heh, i guess i could measure time inside nim, you're right :) didn't cross my mind |
14:42:19 | Araq | hmm doesn't sound like me. I'm always concerned about security. :P |
14:42:24 | * | floppydh quit (Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1) |
14:44:51 | FromGitter | <narimiran> @Araq can i use `times.cpuTime` for measurement? why is `nimbench` your recommendation? |
14:45:28 | Araq | so that you test nimble.exe |
14:45:37 | Araq | XD |
14:45:39 | * | floppydh joined #nim |
14:45:53 | FromGitter | <narimiran> :D |
14:47:17 | * | athenot quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
14:47:49 | salewski | Araq, for the bug of the prime guy from forum post https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/3613/1#22540 |
14:47:52 | salewski | The fact that "for byt in seg[0..Kn-1]:" creates a copy of the seq for each call is indeed not that obviously for beginners... |
14:48:36 | * | athenot joined #nim |
14:49:03 | Araq | it creates a single copy and then iterates over it, no? |
14:49:41 | salewski | Yes, but creates a copy! |
14:50:07 | salewski | And he call it often! |
14:51:13 | salewski | That may be a common pattern when someone wants to process only a few elements of a seq. |
14:51:24 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
14:52:17 | Araq | a day only has 24 hours |
14:52:38 | Araq | and sometimes I care more about the users who can read a tutorial. |
14:53:12 | * | athenot quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
14:53:53 | salewski | That it crash when swapping starts is a bit strange for me still. |
14:54:01 | dom96 | I guess we should change the syntax to `list[!thisCopies!0..kn-1!thisCopies!]` :) |
14:54:31 | salewski | But of course turning of GC and not btesting with GC when there are problems is not really smart. |
14:54:58 | Araq | dom96: Python's slices copy too and nobody does mind ;-) |
14:55:29 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds) |
14:55:44 | salewski | Python people care not that much for performance. |
14:56:11 | Araq | besides we have non-copy slices in the proposals under the not-to-be-mentioned-name |
14:57:05 | salewski | Of course it is not that surprising that that construct creates a copy, but one may overlook that fact easily. |
14:57:32 | Araq | well if you "care" about performance and don't use a profiler. or any tool. |
14:57:42 | Araq | and disable the GC based on guesswork. |
14:58:00 | Araq | then you may have other problems than the programming language that you happen to use... |
14:58:35 | salewski | Yes that is true -- but with V 1.0 there will come many fools to Nim. |
14:59:46 | Araq | let us get out V 1.0 first and then worry, ok? |
15:00:07 | Araq | we tried the alternative without much success. |
15:01:18 | Araq | template canImport(x): bool = |
15:01:18 | Araq | compiles: |
15:01:18 | Araq | import x |
15:01:39 | salewski | Yes, it will be really interesting how many new users V 1.0 will bring us. |
15:01:51 | Araq | now works. not sure if developing features based on twitter messages is a wise thing to do... :-( |
15:02:10 | Araq | but arguably it was only a bug that it didn't work before |
15:02:48 | PMunch | Haha, it's nice to take inspiration where you can |
15:04:30 | * | athenot joined #nim |
15:04:56 | salewski | Araq, maybe you can comment on https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/3604 I dont understand it. And there is just a new invisible post. |
15:07:28 | salewski | Bye. |
15:07:40 | Araq | the manual in 0.18 should states that the type of an integer literal is 'int' unless it doesn't fit in 32 bits |
15:08:05 | dom96 | You see, now I can reply to that tweet with this amazing template ;) |
15:08:18 | Araq | otherwise it's of type int64 |
15:08:37 | Araq | 10 * 1_000_000_000 is an expression, not a literal |
15:08:46 | Araq | and so the compiler remains silent |
15:09:08 | Araq | it's only about the integer *literals*, not about the resulting values |
15:09:38 | Araq | because the values might not be known at compiletime |
15:10:09 | Araq | dom96: maybe wait for travis to be green :-) |
15:10:32 | dom96 | Too late :P |
15:10:32 | dom96 | https://twitter.com/d0m96/status/971040271784923136 |
15:10:51 | dom96 | That's what I call marketing ;) |
15:12:02 | * | yglukhov joined #nim |
15:12:15 | Araq | some credit goes to andreaferretti |
15:12:20 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> is it possible to create a macro that takes in blocks of statements and also injects some new code? |
15:12:29 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> I want to do something like this - |
15:12:33 | Araq | certainly |
15:12:41 | Araq | that's how .async works, for example |
15:13:37 | Araq | bbl |
15:13:55 | FromGitter | <narimiran> here are some interesting/strange results from my nim installation on my work windows machine: |
15:14:17 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
15:14:20 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> ```api: ⏎ expose add: ⏎ #impl``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9eb04c0a1614b712eb1a60] |
15:14:37 | FromGitter | <narimiran> i'm comparing speed of my personal linux i7-970, and work windows i7-4770 |
15:15:32 | FromGitter | <narimiran> there are three "benchmarks" i'm running, and on average python is 40% faster on i7-4770 than on i7-970 |
15:15:52 | FromGitter | <narimiran> the same tests, nim is only 15% faster |
15:16:02 | * | yglukhov quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
15:16:23 | FromGitter | <narimiran> and to be more interesting, julia almost takes no advantage of this faster cpu |
15:19:14 | PMunch | Did doc2 change to just doc? ref: https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/7279#issuecomment-370801921 |
15:19:25 | dom96 | PMunch: yes |
15:19:38 | PMunch | When did that happen` |
15:19:51 | dom96 | It's in the changelog... |
15:19:55 | dom96 | https://nim-lang.org/blog/2018/03/01/version-0180-released.html |
15:19:59 | dom96 | Under "tool changes" |
15:20:11 | * | athenot_ joined #nim |
15:21:17 | * | athenot quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
15:22:42 | PMunch | Aah, so as he says jsondoc should become jsondoc0 and jsondoc2 should become the new jsondoc then? |
15:24:51 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> so can anyone provide me with an explanation of how to do what I'm trying to do? |
15:25:08 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> I'll try to create a playground sample with a trivial example |
15:25:45 | * | dddddd joined #nim |
15:31:52 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
15:32:18 | * | d10n-work joined #nim |
15:34:08 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
15:36:41 | Yardanico | Araq, that commit hash start :D eeea000 - https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/commit/eeea00058247e09a81e802f541194389d673c627 |
15:37:44 | * | salewski quit (Quit: WeeChat 1.9.1) |
15:39:29 | * | endragor quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
15:40:00 | * | Jesin joined #nim |
15:52:37 | * | couven92 quit (Quit: Client disconnecting) |
15:52:41 | * | endragor joined #nim |
15:55:52 | * | endragor quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
15:57:45 | * | PMunch quit (Quit: Leaving) |
16:03:00 | * | endragor joined #nim |
16:03:16 | * | miran joined #nim |
16:09:18 | FromGitter | <jaco60> When i write `Foo = concept x, y`, it means that x and y are types potentially differents, right? |
16:10:23 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> nope |
16:10:58 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> it means: to check that a type T satisfies concept Foo |
16:11:03 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> take x, y from T |
16:11:17 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> and then do something |
16:11:32 | FromGitter | <jaco60> @andreaferretti Thanks... |
16:11:54 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> you have to think what would even mean for x and y to have different type |
16:12:18 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> say you have some type T that you want to figure out whether it belongs to the concept |
16:12:36 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> how do you come up with another type for the second variable? |
16:13:11 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> if you think of it a bit, you will see that it would not be well define |
16:14:24 | FromGitter | <jaco60> i was wondering, because i’ve seen two versions of Comparable concept… The one in the manual (with x and y), another in the dom96 book, with only x... |
16:14:49 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> it's just more readable with two variables |
16:15:02 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> using only one may be confusing |
16:15:32 | FromGitter | <jaco60> yes, in fact, it does confuse me! |
16:16:50 | * | SenasOzys joined #nim |
16:17:33 | FromGitter | <andreaferretti> :-) |
16:20:45 | * | floppydh quit (Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1) |
16:34:19 | * | Trustable joined #nim |
16:36:47 | * | subsetpark joined #nim |
16:49:12 | * | jubalh left #nim (#nim) |
16:53:24 | * | Jesin quit (Quit: Leaving) |
16:54:52 | Yardanico | @data-man - I think t1ha won't satisfy our needs - https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/6600#issuecomment-370844205 |
16:54:59 | Yardanico | because nim wants to be very portable |
16:57:47 | * | cornfeedhobo quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
17:02:31 | * | cornfeedhobo joined #nim |
17:07:26 | * | xkapastel joined #nim |
17:10:17 | * | vivus joined #nim |
17:17:12 | * | r3d9u11 joined #nim |
17:17:37 | * | cornfeedhobo quit (Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in) |
17:22:01 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> how could I write this - https://play.nim-lang.org/?gist=7582c7fd35e6eadb2f7e15ec8249612f |
17:22:16 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> so that instead of having to call api() and then be able to use the template produced by the API macro |
17:22:41 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> I could do something like - ⏎ ⏎ ```api: ⏎ expose add: ⏎ #body``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9ece60c3c5f8b90d3e207d] |
17:26:17 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Have api accept untyped argument, return statement list with that template and the passed argument. Basically what you're already doing, just appending the body as well |
17:27:02 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> ah okay I'll give that a shot! thanks @ZarsBranchkin! |
17:27:24 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Hm, wait, i think the argument already will be statement list, so prepend template definition to it |
17:27:38 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> okay |
17:29:05 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> I do something similar as well, except rewriting procedure defintions to make them compatible with external application |
17:38:31 | * | cornfeedhobo joined #nim |
17:41:26 | * | xet7 joined #nim |
17:47:45 | * | birdspider quit (Quit: Leaving) |
17:57:10 | * | sendell quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
18:02:19 | * | xet7 quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
18:14:05 | * | xet7 joined #nim |
18:21:22 | * | endragor quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
18:37:50 | FromGitter | <msiglreith> Hey! I'm trying to implement a macro to 'rewrite' a function (injecting own code) but I'm stuck at a 'redefinition' error: https://play.nim-lang.org/?gist=514ae8ff994475d50deb46c6cda99c5b ⏎ Any way to 'undefine' to old function? thanks |
18:40:11 | * | Vladar joined #nim |
18:41:55 | * | PMunch joined #nim |
18:44:49 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> I'd set argument as result, set result.params[0] as uint32 and append nodes to result.body |
18:45:05 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> Would be cleaner and more readable |
18:46:56 | FromGitter | <ZarsBranchkin> On phone though, won't be able to edit snippet |
18:47:40 | FromGitter | <alehander42> your poblem is that you need |
18:47:44 | FromGitter | <alehander42> code to be `untyped` |
18:47:46 | FromGitter | <alehander42> not `typed` |
18:48:01 | FromGitter | <alehander42> because you want to run the type system after the rewrite |
18:48:12 | FromGitter | <alehander42> also, you can just return newProc, no need of stmt list |
18:48:16 | FromGitter | <alehander42> for it |
18:50:21 | Araq | hi alehander42 |
18:50:47 | Araq | I've written another karax related experiment and I'd like your opinion on it |
18:51:07 | Araq | I used Karax's DSL and threw away the DOM diffing :-) |
18:52:13 | Araq | so in every onaction callback you have to run some specialized DOM update |
18:53:25 | * | rokups quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
18:53:26 | Araq | so it's slightly more tedious to work with but as reward one gets to work on the stateful browser DOM directly, perfect interop with all the JavaScript components |
18:54:18 | Araq | no idea how it will scale for bigger examples though :-) |
18:57:55 | FromGitter | <alehander42> very interesting |
18:58:03 | FromGitter | <alehander42> I will take a look now |
18:58:06 | FromGitter | <alehander42> the trello one right |
18:58:10 | Araq | right |
18:59:11 | FromGitter | <aboisvert> perhaps related karax question: Is there a way to exclude DOM nodes (recursively) from the diff'ing algorithm? I'm running into issues with a charting library that's doing changes behind Karax's back and it's triggering assertion failures |
18:59:28 | Araq | look at the examples |
18:59:43 | Araq | I have added some blacklisting of DOM IDs for echarts |
19:00:51 | FromGitter | <aboisvert> thanks, I'll take a look |
19:00:57 | FromGitter | <msiglreith> @ZarsBranchkin @alehander42 Thanks, as it doesn't seem to be possible with `typed` I'm switching to `untyped` :) |
19:01:54 | FromGitter | <aboisvert> @Araq Are you referring to `setForeignNodeId` ? |
19:02:28 | FromGitter | <aboisvert> (i was wondering what that was for ... cool) |
19:04:56 | Araq | yeah setForeignNodeId |
19:11:07 | Araq | the DOM updates can be automated further by "reactive" data structures/ideas but I'm not happy with them, too much runtime magic. The existing solutions all require something like 'onNextTickDo' to prevent infinite update loops which gets confusing |
19:12:51 | shodan45 | I haven't read all the context for that, but "onNextTickDo" & "infinite update loops" makes me shiver a bit |
19:13:12 | Araq | direct DOM updates are a poor man's reactive system but sometimes worse is better. |
19:13:34 | Araq | shodan45, well that's what I want to avoid like the plague :-) |
19:14:14 | Araq | so don't worry, these things are not in Karax. |
19:17:32 | shodan45 | OT: wow, Dart needs to get its marketing together... it just feels so confused - v1 vs v2, client & server vs just client... blargh. |
19:19:52 | * | r3d9u11 quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
19:23:58 | * | solitudesf quit (Quit: solitudesf) |
19:48:49 | * | arthurz joined #nim |
19:50:37 | * | zarthur quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
19:52:40 | * | endragor joined #nim |
20:05:23 | FromGitter | <zetashift> dart's marketing is all flutter |
20:05:29 | FromGitter | <zetashift> maybe angular but that ain't hip atm |
20:05:39 | FromGitter | <zetashift> also #off-topic kek |
20:13:30 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> hello |
20:14:16 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> in karax when a component tries to render a variable which is null the whole render fails |
20:14:22 | * | athenot_ quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
20:16:53 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
20:17:08 | * | athenot joined #nim |
20:18:19 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9ef78bc3c5f8b90d3f1eb3] |
20:18:59 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> if I remove ```text(s.name)``` it works fine |
20:21:04 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> `````` |
20:30:03 | PMunch | ivanflorentin, yeah what would you expect would happen? |
20:37:28 | * | athenot_ joined #nim |
20:37:33 | * | athenot quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
20:41:58 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> to render an empty text enstead |
20:42:33 | Yardanico | you should initialize the variable with "" then |
20:43:50 | * | nsf quit (Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1) |
20:44:17 | * | endragor joined #nim |
20:50:41 | FromGitter | <ivanflorentin> and validate everything before rendering or risk breking the app... I think it would make sense to just render "" whenever a variable comes null |
20:51:09 | Araq | you can annotate your fields with 'not nil' and make the compiler check it for you |
20:51:51 | Araq | and you really should "validate everything" IMO |
20:53:48 | * | miran quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!) |
21:06:32 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) |
21:06:40 | * | athenot joined #nim |
21:08:17 | * | athenot_ quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
21:13:10 | * | athenot quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
21:13:28 | * | Vladar quit (Quit: Leaving) |
21:13:48 | * | athenot joined #nim |
21:22:01 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> that was a long day 😧 |
21:22:36 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> but I managed to write my first macro in between surgery sessions :D |
21:26:40 | Araq | between surgery sessions? o.O |
21:26:46 | Araq | get well soon please |
21:27:29 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> thanks :) I'm fine though - had a basal cell carcinoma removed from the top of my head |
21:27:41 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> just took a long time |
21:32:16 | * | endragor joined #nim |
21:37:55 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` So, I'll try to learn Nim over the week, what would be the recommended resource for a C programmer? |
21:47:00 | * | PMunch quit (Quit: leaving) |
21:47:37 | dom96 | Temperance: I haven't personally read this, but it might be helpful: https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/wiki/Nim-for-C-programmers |
21:47:45 | * | far4ia4650 quit (Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1) |
21:47:51 | dom96 | Also if you see things that could be better explained, please edit it, it's a wiki after all :) |
21:49:26 | * | whisky joined #nim |
21:50:11 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
21:52:32 | * | Jesin joined #nim |
21:56:37 | Araq | Temperance: you can also try to translate some C code via c2nim |
21:59:37 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` well, for starters, the two links on that page actually don't work :P |
21:59:51 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> any ideas? - https://gist.github.com/zacharycarter/a4058a6e536e45c6eb88b493eb34708d |
21:59:54 | dom96 | lol |
22:00:00 | dom96 | Simple to fix |
22:00:28 | Araq | which links? |
22:00:50 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` the ones for the tutorial |
22:00:56 | dom96 | I fixed them |
22:01:17 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` http://nim-lang.org/tut1.html |
22:01:46 | Araq | oh you mean on the wiki |
22:01:48 | Araq | ok |
22:01:57 | FromGitter | <matrixbot> `Temperance` ah, nice :P |
22:06:52 | * | endragor joined #nim |
22:11:43 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
22:17:02 | * | endragor joined #nim |
22:17:49 | * | Jesin quit (Quit: Leaving) |
22:19:47 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> anyone have a sec to look at my macro issue? |
22:20:12 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> ```code paste, see link``` [https://gitter.im/nim-lang/Nim?at=5a9f141cc3c5f8b90d3fbae5] |
22:22:44 | * | Jesin joined #nim |
22:23:51 | * | Trustable quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
22:30:44 | GitDisc | <sion> Type inference question, should a and b in this gist infer to int32? https://gist.github.com/GrundleTrundle/de42f236d3be74def27da86fa47c88af |
22:31:27 | * | Jesin quit (Quit: Leaving) |
22:35:09 | * | Jesin joined #nim |
22:36:27 | dom96 | sion: pretty sure you're getting `a`=index, `b`=tuple |
22:36:39 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
22:42:23 | GitDisc | <sion> You are right. It should have been "for a, b in items(edges)". I knew I had destructured tuples before, but forgot that was with iterators. |
22:44:01 | dom96 | yeah, Nim will use `pairs` implicitly if you have two vars in a for loop |
22:44:26 | GitDisc | <sion> Thanks. |
22:53:47 | GitDisc | <Teapotrick> Hate to be that guy, but I can't get "--out" to work on c2nim. it just errors out, spouting that it can't open the outfile (which... i mean, it doesn't exist yet). |
22:54:07 | GitDisc | <treeform> it could be a directory or some thing? |
22:54:34 | GitDisc | <treeform> I have run into directory thing before |
22:55:35 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> I'm stuck on a windows machine for the time being - does anyone have a shell recommendation or should I just use PowerShell? |
22:57:03 | GitDisc | <Teapotrick> @treeform oh, like it wants a directory, rather than a file...? |
22:57:25 | GitDisc | <Teapotrick> nope: "Can't open <that directory> |
22:57:59 | GitDisc | <Teapotrick> ah, craps. it has to be absolute. ffffffff no `~` for me |
22:58:07 | GitDisc | <Teapotrick> thanks for the response. 😄 |
22:58:12 | * | birdspider joined #nim |
23:00:04 | GitDisc | <treeform> zacharycarter, I do! Let me find it. |
23:00:19 | GitDisc | <treeform> I recommend this: http://cmder.net/ |
23:01:03 | * | reginald_ joined #nim |
23:01:21 | GitDisc | <treeform> You can chose to run cmd, power shell or bash with it. So its not really a different shell just a skin that combines them nicely. |
23:01:54 | FromGitter | <zacharycarter> treeform: ah cool - I was about to ask about that. I need to invoke powershell so that is good :D |
23:03:13 | * | endragor joined #nim |
23:04:28 | GitDisc | <treeform> its a "console emulator" not a shell... console emulator is the GUI part and shell is the non gui part. |
23:05:04 | GitDisc | <treeform> console emulator that windows ships with is bad, while shell is awkward you need it to do windows stuff. |
23:05:14 | GitDisc | <treeform> console emulator that windows ships with is bad, while shell is awkward but you need it to do windows stuff. |
23:05:30 | * | reginald_ quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
23:13:15 | * | birdspider quit (Quit: Leaving) |
23:19:43 | * | endragor quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
23:31:52 | * | MJCaley joined #nim |
23:32:08 | * | S1tiSchu quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
23:32:26 | * | S1tiSchu joined #nim |
23:41:50 | * | NimBot joined #nim |
23:43:15 | * | d10n-work quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
23:43:17 | arthurz | Are we going to get #Nim #REPL anytime soon? |
23:46:02 | * | endragor joined #nim |
23:48:39 | dom96 | arthurz: https://media3.giphy.com/media/wPkWlsnohtn7a/giphy.gif |
23:54:21 | FromGitter | <zetashift> @zacharycarter those kinds of skin cancer rarely form a threat, unless you delay it waaaayy too long, so glad you got rid of it asap ! |
23:54:31 | FromGitter | <zetashift> And I'm also a cmder |
23:54:55 | * | MJCaley quit (Quit: MJCaley) |
23:58:24 | arthurz | @zacharycarter I trust the worst is behind you. You are a very brave man! Also devoted to #Nim :-) |