00:07:47 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
00:11:50 | * | DAddYE quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
00:16:09 | Varriount | 1,986 lines down, about 13,000 lines left. |
00:18:04 | Araq | I thought the header is only 800 lines |
00:19:31 | Varriount | I'm going through winbase.h right now |
00:19:44 | Varriount | I finished that other one a while ago. |
00:19:54 | Araq | including examples? |
00:20:09 | Varriount | Examples of what? |
00:20:20 | Araq | how to use COM with Nimrod? |
00:20:31 | Araq | the disphelper comes with lots of nice examples |
00:21:04 | Varriount | Use c2nim on the headers of the examples? |
00:21:23 | Varriount | Or straight out translate the examples by hand? |
00:21:32 | Araq | dunno whatever works better |
00:21:43 | Araq | by hand I suppose |
00:21:56 | Araq | as you care about nice readable idiomatic nimrod code for them |
00:22:21 | Varriount | Speaking of which, is there a style guide or anything for nimrod? |
00:26:20 | Araq | not really there is only http://nimrod-code.org/apis.html |
00:27:38 | Araq | and also http://nimrod-code.org/intern.html#coding-guidelines |
00:35:14 | Araq | I have to sleep now. good night |
00:35:37 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
00:48:57 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
00:48:59 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
00:59:58 | dom96 | well babel officially works on arm :D |
01:02:51 | Varriount | Yay? |
01:03:30 | * | Varriount throws confetti around dom96 |
01:03:34 | dom96 | lol |
01:06:58 | * | q66 quit (Quit: Leaving) |
01:24:46 | NimBot | nimrod-code/packages master 9c3c280 achesak [+0 ±1 -0]: Added extmath. |
01:24:46 | NimBot | nimrod-code/packages master ca83b7d Dominik Picheta [+0 ±1 -0]: Merge pull request #26 from achesak/master... 2 more lines |
01:45:37 | * | gurug33k quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
01:58:26 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
02:22:28 | * | brson_ joined #nimrod |
02:26:14 | * | brson quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
03:00:44 | * | Ricky_Ricardo joined #nimrod |
03:00:49 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
03:00:57 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
03:52:14 | * | DAddYE quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
03:52:47 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
03:57:16 | * | DAddYE quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
04:04:05 | * | OrionPK quit (Quit: Leaving) |
04:16:31 | * | Varriount quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
04:38:26 | * | Ricky_Ricardo quit (Quit: www.rickcarlino.com) |
04:44:16 | * | brson_ quit (Quit: leaving) |
05:12:43 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
05:12:50 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
05:56:16 | * | Varriount joined #nimrod |
06:45:31 | * | Endy joined #nimrod |
07:21:11 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
07:24:31 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
07:24:31 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
07:43:33 | * | wlhlm joined #nimrod |
07:51:05 | * | io2 joined #nimrod |
07:54:06 | * | Associat0r quit (Quit: Associat0r) |
08:00:11 | * | h3lm joined #nimrod |
08:03:02 | * | wlhlm quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
08:12:28 | * | h3lm is now known as wlhlm |
08:38:25 | * | Endy joined #nimrod |
08:57:53 | * | dyu joined #nimrod |
09:27:59 | * | q66 joined #nimrod |
09:30:38 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
09:36:19 | * | wlhlm quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) |
09:36:21 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
09:36:23 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
09:45:53 | * | Endy joined #nimrod |
09:46:41 | * | melba joined #nimrod |
09:51:17 | Araq | hi melba welcome |
09:51:26 | melba | :) |
09:52:09 | io2 | melba comes from ##C++ and he likes pythy syntax, so I told him that nimrod is python done right :P |
09:52:30 | io2 | melba: Araq is the designer of the language |
09:52:39 | io2 | and dom96 is a nimrod wiz |
09:53:25 | Araq | and I thought Nimrod is C++ done right ;-) |
09:53:34 | io2 | lawl |
10:34:00 | dom96 | 'morning |
11:28:44 | * | silven quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
11:31:14 | * | silven joined #nimrod |
11:35:47 | * | silven quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
11:37:05 | * | wlhlm joined #nimrod |
11:37:42 | * | silven joined #nimrod |
11:42:28 | * | silven quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
11:48:12 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
11:48:16 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
11:50:50 | * | silven joined #nimrod |
12:34:35 | * | [1]Endy joined #nimrod |
12:38:06 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
12:38:06 | * | [1]Endy is now known as Endy |
12:38:55 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
13:11:18 | * | dyu quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
13:24:27 | * | dyu joined #nimrod |
14:00:04 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
14:00:09 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
14:11:45 | * | OrionPK joined #nimrod |
14:30:26 | * | filwit joined #nimrod |
14:30:36 | filwit | hi folks |
14:31:35 | Araq | hey filwit |
14:37:49 | * | Associat0r joined #nimrod |
15:01:22 | * | gdos joined #nimrod |
15:04:04 | dom96 | hey filwit, what's up? |
15:04:21 | Araq | dom96: filwit made an aporia icon for you ;-) |
15:05:29 | filwit | hey dom96, not much, just wanted to try out generics real quick (but i'm guessing they're not in the Arch repo build, so i'm building Nimrod) |
15:06:30 | filwit | Araq, dom96: later i'll design it, but i'll only be around for another half hour or so |
15:07:19 | dom96 | filwit: That would be great, thanks. |
15:15:03 | filwit | you guys see the phoronix news about this: http://www.polygon.com/2013/10/12/4826190/linux-only-needs-one-killer-game-to-explode-says-battlefield-director ? |
15:15:10 | filwit | kinda cool |
15:18:13 | * | rel42 joined #nimrod |
15:18:16 | Araq | dunno they keep saying things like that for decades now |
15:18:52 | filwit | have they? i've only been using linux for the last 2-3 years |
15:19:03 | Araq | yes |
15:19:10 | Araq | it's always "almost there" |
15:19:16 | filwit | well.. don't destroy my dreams man.. |
15:19:16 | Araq | hi rel42, welcome |
15:19:24 | rel42 | hello! |
15:19:49 | filwit | hi |
15:21:51 | dom96 | valve just needs to make HL3 a linux exclusive. |
15:24:23 | shodan45 | dom96: hah |
15:24:42 | filwit | dom96: yeah that would be awesome, haha |
15:24:47 | rel42 | yeah, and destroy their good reputation |
15:24:53 | filwit | but not going to happen, sadly |
15:25:50 | filwit | and really, i don't like the idea of Linux screwing over Windows gamers just for popularity |
15:26:05 | filwit | i just hope they make HL3 sometime in the next decade |
15:26:20 | shodan45 | I've been using linux since about 1999, and as my primary OS since 2002-ish, so for me linux is "already there" ;) |
15:26:30 | rel42 | didn't valve file for a trademark for hl3, or was that fake? |
15:27:08 | filwit | no idea |
15:27:30 | shodan45 | hmm, maybe make HL3 free but only for linux |
15:28:06 | shodan45 | and cost money for windows & mac |
15:28:45 | rel42 | eh, never mind what i just said, turns out it was fake: http://www.valvetime.net/threads/fake-european-half-life-3-portal-3-trademarks-filed.243962/ |
15:30:46 | EXetoC | 2014 will be the year of linux. that's a fact |
15:31:10 | rel42 | yearOfLinux = getCurrentYear() + 1 |
15:31:10 | Araq | EXetoC: people say the same about nimrod ;-) |
15:31:13 | EXetoC | or maybe some time before 2025 |
15:34:22 | * | rel42 quit (Quit: Leaving) |
15:40:08 | * | gdos quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
15:40:40 | shevy | hehe |
15:51:19 | * | gdos joined #nimrod |
16:01:23 | * | filwit quit (Quit: Leaving) |
16:11:58 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
16:12:01 | * | ltbarcly quit (Client Quit) |
16:15:56 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
16:27:01 | * | ltbarcly quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) |
16:27:30 | Varriount | Meep! |
16:30:17 | * | dyu quit (Quit: Leaving) |
16:40:59 | Varriount | Anyone know if there's a more specific type I can specify, other than float, for a type that should be positive and a float? |
16:42:39 | Araq | type PositiveFloat = range [0.0 .. 100.0] |
16:42:53 | Araq | I don't think this is valid for now: |
16:42:58 | Varriount | It isn't |
16:43:01 | Araq | type PositiveFloat = range [0.0 .. Inf] |
16:43:12 | Varriount | 'range' only accepts ordinals. |
16:43:22 | Araq | really? hmm |
16:43:35 | Araq | sounds like a bug then |
16:43:52 | Araq | well tbh float ranges are not yet tested at all |
16:44:00 | Araq | it's more of a planned feature |
16:44:18 | Varriount | No big deal. |
16:44:40 | Varriount | Araq, have you thought of any methods for more.. explicit importation? |
16:45:07 | Araq | nimrod's module system is complete now with 0.9.3 afaict |
16:45:19 | Araq | from foo import bar, gah, ugh |
16:45:38 | BitPuffin | Araq: Would you say that Nimrod's metaprogramming stuff is as powerful as that found in clisp? |
16:45:56 | BitPuffin | or even moaar |
16:46:28 | Araq | nimrod's metaprogramming is more powerful than anything except "Kernel" the language based on fexprs |
16:46:32 | Varriount | Yes, but if you have a type with a bunch of associated methods, you have to either implicitly import the entire module, or explicitly import all of them. |
16:47:07 | Araq | import foo except this, that |
16:47:51 | Varriount | What would be the best way to import a type, and all it's associated methods, from a module? |
16:48:03 | Araq | import foo |
16:48:18 | Varriount | But doesn't that only import the type? |
16:48:29 | Araq | there is no notion of "all associated methods" |
16:49:01 | Varriount | I mean, procedures for which the target type is the first argument. |
16:49:13 | Araq | yeah I know what you mean |
16:49:22 | Araq | it's not a concept in the language though |
16:50:53 | Varriount | Hrm. |
16:51:10 | Araq | and I don't get this widely spread misguided idea of "namespace pollution" |
16:51:36 | Araq | nimrod is optimistic, import everything, deal with the conflicts should the need arise |
16:51:48 | Araq | and the need very rarely arises |
16:52:08 | Varriount | Araq, just the other day, BitPuffin had a problem whereby he was calling an accidentally import procedure on a type, and getting errors. |
16:52:18 | Varriount | *imported |
16:53:11 | Araq | that's a problem with the 'immediate' macros, not a problem with the import mechanism |
16:53:35 | Araq | and it would only be important if it leads to a bug |
16:53:57 | Varriount | Ah well. *shrug* |
16:54:20 | Araq | "hard to understand compiler errors" are not important at this stage |
16:54:35 | Araq | and the error messages are often very good anyway |
16:54:48 | Varriount | True. |
16:56:31 | Varriount | Oh, by the way, your snippet for a natural float worked. |
16:56:48 | Varriount | The code I was using used float32's, I guess that was why |
16:57:25 | BitPuffin | Araq: how so? |
16:57:59 | Araq | BitPuffin: because immediate macros do not participate in overload resolution |
16:58:47 | Araq | otherwise the compiler would easily have resolved the conflict for you |
16:59:32 | BitPuffin | Araq: I was war referring to how is nimrod more powerful than anything except Kernel? |
17:00:35 | BitPuffin | And Kernel is a lisp dialect haha |
17:00:52 | Araq | yeah just like ML is a Lisp dialect |
17:01:07 | Araq | in other words: I disagree |
17:01:24 | Araq | Kernel doesn't even exist as an implementation |
17:01:36 | BitPuffin | Okay but back to the real question, how is it more powerful than everything? |
17:01:45 | BitPuffin | http://klisp.org/ ? looks like an implementation to me |
17:03:22 | Araq | interesting |
17:03:56 | Araq | ok so now it exists :P |
17:04:49 | BitPuffin | that's nice |
17:04:59 | BitPuffin | apparently just an interpreter as far as I can see |
17:05:17 | Araq | BitPuffin: as far as I'm aware Nimrod is the only language which supports term rewriting macros with side effect and aliases analysis |
17:05:26 | BitPuffin | written in C |
17:05:33 | Araq | so in this sense it's more powerful than the others |
17:06:38 | BitPuffin | Araq: Hmm, yeah I haven't heard of any other languages that do that either. But at the same time, there might be stuff that lisp can do that nimrod can't for example? I don't know yet because I don't know much lisp |
17:10:29 | capisce | well, there are reader macros for instance |
17:10:39 | Araq | there are lots of things you can do in Lisp that you can't do directly in Nimrod due to its static typing |
17:11:02 | Araq | it's most obvious when you're designing a callback system |
17:11:54 | Araq | strictly speaking however dynamic typing is a subset of static typing ... |
17:13:01 | BitPuffin | I can imagine one benefiting from learning lisp before using nimrod, as there is more lisp documentation out there that would help you get familiar with advanced meta programming and creating DSLs |
17:13:14 | Araq | so ... it's a complex question with a simple answer: Nimrod is more powerful because I say so :P |
17:13:27 | BitPuffin | Haha! Well fair enough |
17:14:04 | BitPuffin | perhaps you wouldn't have created nimrod otherwise :P |
17:14:10 | Araq | capisce: reader macros are almost there in the form of source code filters |
17:14:22 | Araq | but fair enough, we don't have them |
17:14:53 | Araq | it's easy enough to use a """string""" and parse it at compile time if you like to use a grammar that's not compatible with Nimrod's |
17:20:07 | capisce | right |
17:26:59 | Varriount | I wonder how hard it would be to make a Nimrod type that mirror's python's int... |
17:27:28 | Varriount | For those that don't know, python's ints have no limits, except for memory |
17:30:35 | Araq | Varriount: it's called "bignum" and there are lots of implementations around |
17:30:42 | Araq | however none for nimrod :-/ |
17:30:51 | Araq | so yeah, excellent next project for you |
17:31:56 | Varriount | Right now, my two main projects are polishing up the disphelper wrapper, and implementing neil frasiers diff-match-patch in nimrod. |
17:32:16 | * | io2 quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
17:32:17 | Araq | diff-match-patch is an excellent project too :-) |
17:33:05 | Varriount | Araq, it's also a very helpful library. |
17:33:34 | Varriount | Which I am using for real-time collaborative editing. |
17:58:32 | * | io2 joined #nimrod |
18:28:18 | BitPuffin | Araq: nimrod needs something like this http://youtu.be/HM1Zb3xmvMc |
18:33:12 | * | ponce- is now known as ponce |
18:35:05 | Araq | BitPuffin: better docs would help too |
18:35:52 | BitPuffin | Araq: haha, yup. But music video has only slightly higher priority :P |
18:36:16 | BitPuffin | I can make you a nimrod death metal song |
18:38:44 | Araq | ok sounds good |
18:39:07 | * | io2 quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
19:09:14 | EXetoC | pie |
19:15:37 | * | rel42 joined #nimrod |
19:35:39 | * | io2 joined #nimrod |
19:46:09 | * | XAMPP joined #nimrod |
20:05:47 | guaqua | hmm. how would i use TTable with a tuple key? i basically have a pair of strings as a key |
20:06:20 | guaqua | using a tuple results in an error, if i'm correct. joining them might be an option, but that'd be a bit rough :/ |
20:06:26 | Araq | import hashes # defines 'hash' for tuple |
20:06:41 | Araq | and then it should simply work (TM) |
20:06:44 | guaqua | oh. thanks! |
20:13:05 | Varriount | Anyone know if there is a built in prepend operator for sequences? |
20:13:55 | OrionPK | http://nimrod-code.org/system.html#415 |
20:14:18 | Varriount | Ah, thanks OrionPK |
20:14:42 | Araq | I was about to suggest 's = x & s' |
20:14:56 | Araq | but it turns out OrionPK knows the stdlib better than I do :-) |
20:15:01 | Varriount | :O |
20:15:07 | OrionPK | :P |
20:23:06 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) |
20:45:04 | guaqua | what does this normally come from? Error: for a 'var' type a variable needs to be passed |
20:45:44 | guaqua | i get this when trying to operate on a TTable with values from iterator |
20:46:01 | * | Associat0r quit (Quit: Associat0r) |
20:47:06 | Araq | well a 'for' loop variable cannot be passed as a 'var' if you use items/pairs but can be if you use mitems/mpairs |
20:47:36 | guaqua | i actually have .keys |
20:47:56 | Araq | mkeys exists too I think |
20:48:09 | Araq | but it's dangerous to modify keys in a hash table |
20:48:41 | guaqua | ahh. i'm looping over the keys of one hash table and updating another one |
20:49:01 | guaqua | but using the values from the .keys for those values |
20:49:08 | guaqua | (mkeys doesn't seem to exist) |
20:49:39 | Araq | for k in x.keys: |
20:49:58 | Araq | y[k] = someValue() |
20:50:04 | * | wlhlm left #nimrod ("weechat 0.4.1") |
20:50:10 | Araq | should work |
20:50:20 | Araq | if you pass 'k' as a var then it can't |
20:50:25 | Araq | for k in x.keys: |
20:50:44 | Araq | p(k) # where p takes a 'var' |
20:50:54 | Araq | doesn't work for obvious reasons |
20:51:00 | guaqua | for u, v in graph.keys: |
20:51:02 | guaqua | not actually |
20:51:05 | guaqua | argh |
20:51:09 | guaqua | gamma[u].incl(v) |
20:51:17 | guaqua | take those two lines in the middle out |
20:51:48 | Araq | gamma is not a var parameter then |
20:51:58 | guaqua | var gamma = initTable[string, TSet[string]]() |
20:52:08 | guaqua | i think i'm completely off |
20:52:46 | Araq | try this: |
20:52:54 | Araq | for k in graph.keys: |
20:53:09 | Araq | gamma[k[0]].incl(k[1]) |
20:53:59 | guaqua | same error |
20:54:46 | Araq | look at the exact column the compiler gives you please |
20:54:56 | * | shafire joined #nimrod |
20:54:57 | shafire | hi |
20:55:11 | Araq | wb shafire |
20:55:14 | guaqua | it's the gamma indexing |
20:55:24 | shafire | where is the video? |
20:55:31 | guaqua | (didn't even realize it also prints out the column, sorry about that!) |
20:55:36 | Araq | ah yeah that makes sense |
20:55:50 | Araq | you have to use 'mget' here then |
20:56:01 | Araq | gamma.mget(u).incl(v) |
20:56:36 | guaqua | basically: hmm. for modifying access, use a different getter? (it works now) |
20:57:08 | Araq | shafire: not online yet :-/ slides are here though: http://nimrod-code.org/talk01/slides.html |
20:57:44 | shafire | thanks |
20:57:56 | shafire | how was the talk for you? :) |
20:57:59 | Araq | guaqua: well nowadays we can overload [] for both ... perhaps. But I kind of like it this way. |
20:58:35 | guaqua | i can see how it can be useful to specify this. a bit like c++ const correctness stuff, or some other languages immutable interfaces |
20:59:54 | Araq | shafire: lots of people enjoyed my talk. I got no negative feedback. Perhaps that means something ... ;-) |
21:00:57 | Araq | guaqua: currently 'var T' as a return type is still a loophole for memory safety. and as long that is the case, I don't think we should make the syntax nicer. (I know how to fix it.) |
21:01:38 | shafire | Araq: sounds good :) |
21:02:38 | guaqua | Araq: can i make the assumption that var return type means that it's not const? (i'm no expert at c++, but that's one of the things i picked up from it) |
21:03:23 | Araq | yes |
21:10:37 | * | brson joined #nimrod |
21:20:36 | guaqua | how badly will i kill my nimrod application's performance if i generate a lot of garbarge? |
21:20:39 | guaqua | completely? |
21:21:50 | Araq | I don't think so |
21:22:07 | Araq | the compiler itself uses the GC like crazy |
21:22:36 | guaqua | is there a way to profile nimrod code? use C tools? |
21:23:07 | Araq | that's an option but there is also the nimrod profiler |
21:24:11 | Araq | http://nimrod-code.org/estp.html |
21:24:26 | guaqua | got it. looks nice |
21:24:46 | Araq | depending on your needs it's a awesome or useless |
21:24:56 | guaqua | :D |
21:24:58 | guaqua | let's see |
21:26:00 | guaqua | off to bed now, though. thanks for all the help! i'll have to do some more investigation tomorrow. looks very promising when it comes to expressive power... |
21:27:19 | Araq | it's nice that you finally start using it :P |
21:35:45 | * | rel42 quit (Quit: Leaving) |
21:39:37 | * | gdos quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
21:39:49 | shafire | off to bed too |
21:39:50 | shafire | bye |
21:39:58 | Araq | bye |
21:40:02 | * | shafire left #nimrod (#nimrod) |
21:40:09 | * | shafire joined #nimrod |
21:40:15 | * | shafire left #nimrod (#nimrod) |
21:41:19 | OrionPK | so Araq, writing that compiler switch to generate a "header" of a nim file with just declarations.. would that just involve writing something similar to docgen? |
21:46:55 | EXetoC | what is it needed for? |
21:47:36 | OrionPK | so you can write nicely encapsulated wrappers for C++ libraries |
21:48:02 | OrionPK | or just nimrod libraries where you only expose a dll and the interface |
21:48:07 | OrionPK | rather than the whole library |
21:50:10 | EXetoC | I'm not sure why you can't control that where the definitions are, but anyway I guess it doesn't hurt, so good luck :> |
21:50:26 | OrionPK | cant control where the definitions are? |
21:51:11 | * | io2 quit () |
21:53:41 | EXetoC | you missed a word |
21:53:54 | EXetoC | but why do we need to separate the two? |
21:54:16 | OrionPK | scenario.. there's a sweet game engine in C++, so I decide I want to write a wrapper for it so it's easy to use with nimrod.. I write the wrapper with a bunch of ugly emits and whatnot |
21:54:56 | OrionPK | any nimrod project that wants to use that library either has to put it in a separate DLL or compile with the cpp switch |
21:55:22 | OrionPK | if you put it in a separate dll you still need a .nim file with all the procs and types |
21:55:31 | EXetoC | ok, and for actual native nimrod libs? |
21:55:32 | OrionPK | that are in the dll |
21:55:40 | OrionPK | that .nim file is what I want to generate automagically |
21:56:03 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
21:56:17 | Demos | hey yall |
21:56:47 | OrionPK | for actual nimrod libs, it could be done for the same reason anyone makes dlls |
21:57:39 | OrionPK | make it so you can distribute a library without the entire source code or keep different bits separate so you can upgrade them more easily later |
22:00:49 | EXetoC | makes sense. I have a serious lack of imagination :> |
22:02:48 | EXetoC | I wonder if I can remedy that with a little bit of biohacking |
22:03:07 | OrionPK | your imagination? |
22:03:59 | Demos | also, I do not think JNI or P/Invoke work with static libs |
22:04:20 | Demos | likely ditto for scripting language integration |
22:04:55 | EXetoC | OrionPK: yeah! |
22:05:36 | * | gdos joined #nimrod |
22:13:01 | OrionPK | does ur brain run arm architecture |
22:13:21 | EXetoC | not yet |
22:23:47 | Demos | so I found that nimrod's style of OO is really nice when one has to export stuff to C |
23:14:19 | * | XAMPP-8 joined #nimrod |
23:17:16 | Varriount | Demos, yeah, it's very... structured |
23:17:32 | * | Varriount likes structure |
23:23:21 | * | Associat0r joined #nimrod |
23:28:28 | * | XAMPP-8 quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
23:29:34 | Demos | I would use the word structish, structured implies inflexibility |
23:39:33 | EXetoC | c(:)-|< |
23:39:41 | * | Varriount quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) |
23:41:03 | * | ltbarcly joined #nimrod |
23:51:55 | * | ltbarcly quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) |
23:52:57 | * | Varriount joined #nimrod |
23:56:36 | Varriount | O_o I think nimbuilder caused my system to crash... |