00:00:04 | flaviu | is the nimrod bitshift unsigned across all implementations? |
00:04:43 | * | brson quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
00:14:37 | * | brson joined #nimrod |
00:16:24 | * | brihat left #nimrod (#nimrod) |
00:25:42 | * | zielmicha quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
00:25:46 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
00:26:04 | * | nequitans_ joined #nimrod |
00:26:53 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
00:30:01 | * | nequitans_ quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
00:35:15 | * | brihat joined #nimrod |
00:48:21 | * | NimBot joined #nimrod |
00:49:41 | * | nolan_d quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
00:51:11 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
00:52:01 | * | brihat quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
00:52:25 | * | brihat joined #nimrod |
01:07:39 | * | grumio2_ left #nimrod (""th-th-th-th-that's all, folks!"") |
01:08:06 | * | DAddYE quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
01:08:44 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
01:14:07 | * | DAddYE quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
01:18:23 | * | rveach|2 joined #nimrod |
01:23:34 | flaviu | Is there any way to get the compiler to give me a file's AST? I only really need the imports and doc comments though. |
01:27:17 | * | q66 quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
01:35:07 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
01:44:24 | * | brson quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
01:59:19 | * | XAMPP quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
02:09:10 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
02:13:13 | * | DAddYE quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
02:20:49 | flaviu | parseFile seems to be what I'm looking for |
02:21:02 | * | rveach|2 quit (Quit: KVIrc 4.2.0 Equilibrium http://www.kvirc.net/) |
02:23:50 | fowl | json.parsefile? |
02:24:53 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
02:28:46 | flaviu | fowl: thanks, but I'm going for getting the AST of a compilation run, so I have to hook into the compiler. I'm not parsing json. |
02:30:54 | fowl | ah ok |
02:35:45 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
02:40:41 | * | flaviu quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
02:43:48 | * | eigenlicht joined #nimrod |
02:45:35 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds) |
03:08:11 | * | nolan_d joined #nimrod |
03:08:25 | * | rejuvyesh[away] is now known as rejuvyesh |
03:33:51 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
03:46:24 | * | DAddYE quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
04:05:13 | * | Demos quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
04:32:46 | reactormonk | btw, issue #1000 \o/ |
04:33:05 | reactormonk | Araq, wanna put up a small announcement on the homepage? |
04:43:21 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
04:59:11 | Skrylar | meep |
05:10:07 | * | nequitans_ quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
05:37:41 | * | Boscop_ quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
05:38:06 | * | Boscop_ joined #nimrod |
05:57:49 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
06:16:07 | * | Demos quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
06:20:38 | * | grumio2 joined #nimrod |
06:26:53 | * | superfunc` joined #nimrod |
06:26:58 | * | molixiaoge joined #nimrod |
06:42:12 | * | grumio2 quit (Quit: leaving) |
06:56:28 | * | molixiaoge quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
07:11:48 | * | runvnc__ quit (Quit: Leaving) |
07:19:25 | * | skyfex_ quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.) |
07:44:49 | * | Mordecai joined #nimrod |
07:45:09 | * | Mordecai is now known as Guest12220 |
07:47:55 | * | psquid quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
08:27:51 | * | awestroke joined #nimrod |
08:28:15 | * | zielmicha joined #nimrod |
09:05:10 | * | sspiff joined #nimrod |
09:08:06 | sspiff | hi, I tried to build nimrod (on Mint 16), and it failed using build.sh |
09:08:30 | sspiff | I ran the final linking command, but moved -lm to the end of the command line instead of at the beginning, and it worked fine |
09:10:55 | sspiff | does the generated C code adhere to any specific standard (c89? c99?) |
09:11:16 | sspiff | and is there any way to just generate the C code and not run the C compiler? |
09:11:32 | sspiff | and is there any way to remove the -ldl dependency? :) |
09:11:46 | sspiff | (those are all my questions, you're safe now) |
09:12:23 | * | DAddYE quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
09:15:15 | * | psquid joined #nimrod |
09:15:15 | fowl | sspiff, 0.9.2 is ancient now, everybody runs the shiny new devel branch |
09:16:48 | fowl | g2g. read the readme its just a few steps. gl |
09:18:31 | * | Guest12220 quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
09:29:25 | * | awestroke quit (Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.) |
09:29:31 | * | awestroke joined #nimrod |
09:57:22 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
10:03:13 | * | VegBerg joined #nimrod |
10:03:34 | VegBerg | Hello |
10:03:58 | VegBerg | I am trying to compile babel, but I get this error: babelpkg\packageinfo.nim(4, 14) Error: cannot open 'version' |
10:08:19 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
10:20:01 | VegBerg | Never mind, I have resolved my issue. |
10:20:20 | * | VegBerg quit (Quit: Page closed) |
10:27:27 | * | BitPuffin quit (Read error: Operation timed out) |
10:37:03 | * | awestroke quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
11:04:59 | Araq | sspiff: --compileOnly doesn't run the C compiler, the produced C is "real world C" and makes use of GCC or visual C features |
11:07:21 | Araq | welcome btw |
11:11:43 | sspiff | Araq: thanks! |
11:12:02 | sspiff | and there's no getting around -ldl? |
11:12:42 | Araq | dynlib ends up using dlsym |
11:12:58 | Araq | you can try to get rid of it with --dynlibOverride |
11:13:12 | Araq | patches are welcome once you figured it out ;-) |
11:13:45 | Araq | in theory it's possible and not even that hard but I bet you need to patch something somewhere to be able to get rid of -ldl |
11:16:19 | Araq | vvl |
11:16:23 | Araq | bll |
11:16:24 | Araq | bbl |
11:43:40 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
12:22:46 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
12:47:05 | * | OrionPK joined #nimrod |
12:51:15 | * | Kooda joined #nimrod |
12:51:22 | * | darkf quit (Quit: Leaving) |
12:55:51 | * | flaviu quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
13:13:22 | * | zielmicha quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) |
13:31:00 | * | easy_muffin joined #nimrod |
13:43:03 | * | Kooda quit (Quit: leaving) |
13:45:37 | * | askatasuna joined #nimrod |
14:07:00 | * | io2 joined #nimrod |
14:10:40 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
14:28:32 | * | io2 quit () |
14:57:41 | * | io2 joined #nimrod |
15:02:37 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
15:03:18 | * | Demos quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
15:13:54 | * | flaviu quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
15:18:33 | * | superfunc` quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) |
15:31:57 | * | psquid quit (Quit: work) |
15:40:08 | * | nolan_d left #nimrod (#nimrod) |
15:47:05 | * | Endy joined #nimrod |
16:06:49 | * | easy_muffin quit () |
16:50:01 | * | sspiff quit (Quit: Leaving) |
16:54:01 | * | [1]Endy joined #nimrod |
16:57:13 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
16:57:13 | * | [1]Endy is now known as Endy |
17:03:24 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
17:07:13 | * | DAddYE joined #nimrod |
17:20:38 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
17:26:33 | * | easy_muffin joined #nimrod |
17:27:13 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
17:41:37 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
17:42:37 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
17:46:31 | * | Puffin joined #nimrod |
17:47:52 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
17:48:25 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
17:57:30 | * | Puffin is now known as BitPuffin |
17:59:59 | * | easy_muffin quit () |
18:00:42 | * | Boscop_ is now known as Boscop |
18:08:49 | * | BitPuffin quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
18:09:22 | * | Matthias247 joined #nimrod |
18:10:20 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
18:10:59 | flaviu | Is anyone actually using `nimrod scan` for anything? It'd be great if it provided information about the location of the tokens |
18:11:17 | flaviu | But it'd break things that are using it already |
18:11:24 | dom96 | first time I heard about 'nimrod scan' |
18:11:37 | flaviu | It prints the token stream of a file |
18:13:50 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
18:20:21 | flaviu | Ok, submitted pull request 1003 |
18:23:14 | Araq | flaviu: thanks will look at all these PRs this weekend |
18:36:36 | * | evil_CarpNet quit (Quit: Leaving) |
18:37:50 | * | zielmicha joined #nimrod |
18:37:55 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
18:38:00 | * | q66 joined #nimrod |
18:40:34 | Araq | flaviu: what do you use "nimrod scan" for? |
18:41:00 | Araq | also it's not documented, so you can in fact pretty much change everything ;-) |
18:41:34 | * | rejuvyesh is now known as rejuvyesh[away] |
18:42:22 | Araq | ping fowl |
18:44:45 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel ae4b5a8 Dominik Picheta [+0 ±3 -0]: File descriptors are now removed from fds list explicitly in close().... 2 more lines |
18:44:50 | * | flaviu quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
18:45:58 | fowl | Araq, hey |
18:46:17 | Araq | do you happen to have an opencl binding anywhere? |
18:46:17 | fowl | Araq, im going to the store then ill brb |
18:46:24 | fowl | no |
18:46:28 | Araq | ok thanks |
18:47:19 | fowl | this seems to be a regression : https://gist.github.com/fowlmouth/9554171 |
18:47:41 | fowl | its calling the template instead of the proc |
18:47:57 | Araq | yeah |
18:48:03 | Araq | well |
18:48:31 | fowl | i know - its not great code and when i realized this existed i just removed the template |
18:48:52 | Araq | it's a regression |
18:49:05 | Araq | but I'm not sure whether it's a bug |
18:49:21 | Araq | immediate means it doesn't participate in overloading resolution |
18:49:32 | Araq | and immediates are now preferred over other stuff |
18:49:37 | * | askatasuna quit (Quit: WeeChat 0.4.3) |
18:50:22 | Araq | however since it's not "dirty" it should bind 'getShapes' |
18:53:25 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
19:03:43 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
19:21:08 | * | freddy3 joined #nimrod |
19:22:18 | * | seubert joined #nimrod |
19:23:38 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
19:37:27 | * | freddy3 quit (Quit: leaving) |
19:40:31 | dom96 | hi seubert |
19:40:57 | seubert | hi! |
19:41:59 | * | Mat3 joined #nimrod |
19:42:04 | Mat3 | hi all |
19:42:51 | dom96 | hello Mat3 |
19:46:26 | * | clovis joined #nimrod |
19:47:27 | dom96 | hi clovis |
19:47:42 | clovis | hi :) |
19:47:56 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
19:48:45 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
19:49:42 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
19:50:21 | clovis | I was surprised to find nimrod such a beautiful language |
19:50:33 | dom96 | That's nice to hear :) |
19:50:59 | clovis | I had heard about it but was more focused on Rust for a while |
19:51:27 | clovis | I think I could be a lot more productive with Nimrod |
19:51:34 | dom96 | You should definitely get Nimrod a chance, and tell others to do the same. |
19:52:42 | dom96 | *give |
19:52:55 | Mat3 | hi dom96 |
19:53:03 | Mat3 | and clovis |
19:53:13 | clovis | hi there |
19:54:53 | clovis | The latest thing I found out about was StrongSpaces. It makes some sense |
19:56:31 | clovis | Well I should probably dig in somewhere with a toy project.. |
19:56:39 | Demos | it does. Although I would say you should enable it with a pragma an not a compile option |
19:57:11 | clovis | Demos, I used the #! comment |
19:57:23 | clovis | Is that a pragma? |
19:57:55 | Demos | no.. I was wrong |
19:58:13 | clovis | Are there other settings that can be enabled the same way? |
19:58:18 | Demos | when it was initially discussed it was going to be a compiler optime/pragma, it is better this way |
19:58:21 | dom96 | It's certainly innovative, we'll see how well it works in practice. |
19:58:51 | Demos | there are the source code filters, not sure about other stuff |
19:59:26 | clovis | Yeah. When I really tried I could make a confusing expression using strong spaces. But in general I think it reduces noise |
19:59:59 | clovis | Are you using Nimrod for any large project yet? |
20:00:01 | EXetoC | Demos: only during development/testing of this process? |
20:00:15 | clovis | I guess the language is still in flux |
20:00:42 | Demos | EXetoC, what do you mean? |
20:00:52 | EXetoC | clovis: other than the compiler I guess |
20:01:29 | EXetoC | clovis: The Aporia IDE is large-ish I think |
20:01:39 | Araq | hi clovis welcome |
20:01:41 | EXetoC | Demos: nevermind |
20:01:48 | clovis | hi, thanks |
20:01:57 | Araq | dom96: tests/async/C/tasyncawait.nim (reExitcodesDiffer -> reSuccess) let's hope it sticks that way |
20:02:34 | dom96 | Araq: Stop judging the results of my tests :P |
20:02:49 | clovis | ah, EXetoC. Yes that is an ambitious project |
20:04:03 | Araq | clovis: the forum, our build farm, the compiler, c2nim, niminst, babel, aporia, ... all written in nimrod |
20:04:18 | dom96 | clovis: I wrote Aporia, among many other projects and there isn't much I had to change as Nimrod evolved. |
20:04:22 | clovis | neat |
20:04:46 | EXetoC | and that :> all of which are basically official tools, but that doesn't really matter |
20:05:05 | dom96 | I can name some personal projects that I created :P |
20:05:27 | clovis | Tried to get a feel from the forum about T/E/P -prefixes, but couldn't get clarity. Are they to stay or on the way out? |
20:05:34 | dom96 | Jester, ipsum genera, nimkernel, nael, c4hbot ... |
20:05:39 | EXetoC | on the way out |
20:05:44 | dom96 | My little secret opencv thingy |
20:05:47 | clovis | thanks |
20:06:08 | EXetoC | and some commercial project apparently, but I have no idea what that is |
20:06:36 | clovis | Quite a few then, dom96 :) |
20:06:51 | dom96 | yep. |
20:07:05 | Araq | speaking on which ... I plan to rename EInvalidValue to InvalidValueError etc. |
20:07:20 | Araq | as everybody likes the Error suffix |
20:07:24 | dom96 | Yes, and make sure to change it to a ref. |
20:07:40 | dom96 | So that we can write: raise InvalidValueError(msg: "Blah") |
20:08:05 | EXetoC | not even Err? come on, stand your ground :p |
20:08:55 | Araq | EXetoC: nah 'Err' must be bad |
20:09:03 | Araq | otherwise Ruby would use it |
20:09:19 | EXetoC | -.- |
20:09:47 | Mat3 | invalErr (looks readable to me) |
20:10:54 | EXetoC | way to exaggerate ;) |
20:11:02 | Mat3 | *lol* |
20:11:24 | Araq | Mat3: you still seem to think that programs are compiled and run by a computer. In reality they are printed out and hang-up as posters over a programmer's bed |
20:11:57 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
20:11:59 | dom96 | hrm, I was planning on creating a poster and doing just that. |
20:16:12 | fowl | Araq, we all want our code to end up in a split-second shot of a movie about hackers |
20:16:33 | Demos | wait why do exceptions need to be refs to use the constructor? |
20:17:05 | Araq | Demos: because (ref Foo)(a: 1, b: 2) hasn't implemented yet |
20:17:11 | Demos | and I am still going to use E/T prefixes myself, at least for a while |
20:17:22 | Demos | I have already expressed my issues with that though |
20:17:33 | Araq | hu? |
20:17:47 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel ac02ffc Dominik Picheta [+0 ±1 -0]: Fixes compilation of asyncio2 on Windows.... 3 more lines |
20:17:47 | Araq | so do you like them or not? |
20:18:00 | Demos | just that is not bad, but any kind of user defined initialization function should not be called by memory allocation procs |
20:18:19 | Demos | I like T/E, I am wary of ref initialization |
20:18:49 | Demos | would prefer like makeref(initFoo()) where initFoo returns a value type |
20:18:52 | dom96 | Asyncio2 should now work on both Windows and Linux. |
20:19:09 | Demos | but that is not what (ref Foo)(a: 1, b: 2) is, not quite |
20:19:23 | dom96 | Likely very buggy still, but you're welcome to test it. |
20:19:55 | Demos | is there a function that can make a path relitive to another path in os? |
20:21:37 | Demos | I wrote program that is half a clone of GNU stow and half a clone of gobo's tools. But I would love to make the symlinks like ../../Applications/blarg/verison, so chroot works |
20:21:50 | dom96 | Araq: Please take a look at my tasyncawait test. The interface is still a bit low-level. For example: the dispatcher needs to be supplied to most functions which relate to the socket. This could be a big gotcha when creating a new socket and when closing a socket. |
20:22:28 | dom96 | Araq: I'm thinking that a slightly higher level interface can help with that. I'll make an AsyncSocket type and it will handle the dispatcher stuff automatically. |
20:22:40 | dom96 | Araq: What do you think? |
20:23:10 | * | matobet joined #nimrod |
20:23:24 | Matthias247 | dom96: thought the same thing. I would probable associate the socket with an EventLoop which generates an AsyncSocket out of a normal Socket |
20:23:53 | Araq | hi matobet welcome |
20:24:12 | dom96 | Matthias247: Wouldn't that result in the same thing? The dispatcher that I mentioned is really the event loop. |
20:24:32 | dom96 | I think the dispatcher should be a thread-local global var. |
20:24:38 | Matthias247 | dom96: Yes. Only that I would call it EventLoop ;) |
20:24:57 | matobet | Araq: hello |
20:25:03 | dom96 | hey matobet |
20:25:07 | Araq | Demos: no there isn't and when I tried to do that in the compiler it was so buggy I removed it |
20:25:17 | Matthias247 | hmm no, I wouldn't make it thead-local but would still allow multiple event loops in a thread |
20:25:26 | Matthias247 | if anyone really wants it |
20:25:48 | Matthias247 | but as soon as a Socket is bound to an EventLoop you can't move it away from it and send it to another thread |
20:25:57 | Demos | yeah symlinks could be hard. If I was using BSD I could put an envirenment var in the link |
20:26:22 | Matthias247 | so you would probably get a Socket an .accept(), then call .makeAsync(eventLoop) and that would return you an AsyncSocket |
20:26:27 | Demos | maybe we can clone a version from another library/language, or was the problem inherent to the UNIX FS/symlinks? |
20:26:39 | Matthias247 | which additionally to normal read/write would have asyncRead() and asyncWrite() methods |
20:27:06 | Araq | dom96: I dunno. in general backrefs like you suggest suck |
20:27:49 | dom96 | Matthias247: IOCP only allows one IO completion port per thread IIRC |
20:28:14 | Araq | dom96: I think a thread local dispatcher variable is better |
20:28:18 | Matthias247 | dom96: I never used IOCP directly, but I don't think so |
20:29:21 | Matthias247 | dom96: don't see a limitation here? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363862%28v=vs.85%29.aspx |
20:30:49 | Matthias247 | hmm, GetQueueCompletionStatus says: "This function associates a thread with the specified completion port. A thread can be associated with at most one completion port. " |
20:31:16 | dom96 | Araq: Hrm, what do you mean? Isn't that what I suggested? |
20:31:59 | dom96 | Matthias247: Well I'm not sure why you would need multiple event loops anyway |
20:32:26 | dom96 | Matthias247: As for sending sockets to other threads: you can do that, just unregister the socket from the dispatcher and send it to the thread. |
20:32:34 | Matthias247 | dom96: some GUI frameworks use nested event loops for dialogs. But it's nasty |
20:32:39 | dom96 | (Well, at least I think you can) |
20:32:51 | Matthias247 | you don't really want to have multiple event loops |
20:33:23 | Matthias247 | but sometimes it happens because you use multiple libraries where each has it's own and you somehow have to integrate them |
20:33:44 | clovis | Would it be possible to use iterators? |
20:33:59 | dom96 | Yeah, but in that case you don't need multiple event loops from the same library. |
20:34:21 | Matthias247 | When you send the socket to another thread it can only work safely when there are no active read or write operations |
20:34:46 | dom96 | Just call each event loop's poll/do_events or whatever function to do work for x ms and it should be fine. |
20:35:35 | dom96 | Matthias247: I bet I could create a thread safe function which would do that. |
20:35:36 | Matthias247 | if Nimrod really would provide a thread-local Eventloop and every library uses that consequently then you also would avoid the problem |
20:35:41 | Matthias247 | that's the same thing QT does |
20:35:55 | Araq | Matthias247: yeah that's my hope |
20:35:57 | Matthias247 | where each QThread employs an event loop |
20:36:13 | clovis | As long as it is standardised it is good |
20:36:25 | Matthias247 | ok, the more I think about it the more I like it :) |
20:36:53 | dom96 | If we do introduce this magical transparent dispatcher then it would be nice to have a way to override that I think. |
20:38:00 | dom96 | Well actually, the user will still need to write startDispatchLoop or something. |
20:38:01 | Matthias247 | but I wouldn't like a too tight binding of the "runtime" into the language |
20:38:40 | Matthias247 | thisThread.getEventLoop().run() |
20:38:55 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
20:39:16 | Araq | dom96: you could get rid of the dispatcher parameter everywhere and just expose a 'swapDispatcher' for the people who know better |
20:39:29 | dom96 | Araq: Yeah, that was my thought. |
20:39:33 | EXetoC | let's bind Qt! |
20:39:49 | Matthias247 | you could make an interface for an eventloop and allow to set this ;) |
20:40:11 | EXetoC | another fun weekend project |
20:40:11 | * | BitPuffin joined #nimrod |
20:40:16 | dom96 | EXetoC: do it |
20:40:21 | Araq | dom96: since we agreed we'll get the api wrong anyway, let's do it this way |
20:40:38 | dom96 | Araq: lol? |
20:40:40 | Araq | it's also nicer for toy examples |
20:41:06 | EXetoC | *laughs confusingly* |
20:41:32 | dom96 | EXetoC: precisely |
20:42:57 | Matthias247 | some nice features I appreciated from other eventloop implementations: Have a run() and a run_once() function, make custom functions queueable (with and without timeout) and integrate a "microtask queue" |
20:43:21 | * | matobet quit (Quit: Page closed) |
20:45:31 | dom96 | Araq: Take a look at https://github.com/Araq/Nimrod/blob/devel/tests/async/tasyncawait.nim |
20:45:46 | dom96 | You know what would make it nicer? If void in generics worked. |
20:46:11 | dom96 | Please fix that when you get a chance. |
20:46:16 | clovis | Is libuv not sufficient? |
20:47:03 | dom96 | clovis: A pure nimrod implementation is a lot more sexy. :P |
20:47:10 | clovis | Ah ;) |
20:47:16 | Matthias247 | yes, and it's one dependency less |
20:47:34 | flaviu | Is anyone implementing regexes in nimrod? |
20:47:55 | Matthias247 | and libuv doesn't allow something like socket.async_read(buffer, 1000) |
20:47:58 | Demos | I think bable should be able to deal with native deps, but I have no idea how we would do that |
20:48:17 | Demos | erm nimrod has the re module, although I guess that wraps pcre |
20:48:23 | EXetoC | flaviu: there's the 're' module |
20:48:29 | EXetoC | and a module called pegs |
20:48:34 | EXetoC | (PEG) |
20:49:13 | Matthias247 | if you use libuv you would also have to integrate it's build system (gyp) |
20:49:30 | clovis | Not that nice |
20:49:43 | dom96 | Demos: I don't think that's babel's job. |
20:50:06 | Matthias247 | but I agree that it's a very decent library |
20:50:13 | fowl | dom96, you dont use any result in this gist, what are the pfuture[int]s for |
20:50:32 | dom96 | fowl: Because I can't use 'void' in generics. |
20:50:58 | flaviu | EXetoC: I'm aware of re, but it depends on perl. Thanks for peg, thats what I was looking for |
20:51:04 | dom96 | Matthias247: The plan is to allow the usage of libuv instead of IOCP or epoll. |
20:51:19 | clovis | Anyway, every framework has its own event loop nowadays - even sdl if you need gfx |
20:52:18 | Araq | dom96: I fixed it weeks ago |
20:52:25 | Matthias247 | dom96: why would you want it when you already have a good native implementation integrated? |
20:53:40 | Matthias247 | I would have gone for client.send(disp, ...) instead of the other way around :) |
20:53:58 | Matthias247 | But if the explicit disp will go then it doesn't matter |
20:54:05 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
20:54:05 | dom96 | Araq: oh, awesome. |
20:54:35 | dom96 | Matthias247: Because libuv is likely faster. |
20:54:36 | * | Endy joined #nimrod |
20:55:13 | Matthias247 | dom96: When your implementation is good enought it won't be ;) |
20:55:44 | Araq | dom96: don't count on it, libuv likely spends all its time in 'if (errno) goto error' checks :P |
20:55:57 | fowl | dom96, wicked macros in asyncio2 |
20:56:18 | dom96 | Matthias247: Indeed. :) |
20:56:26 | dom96 | Araq: haha |
20:56:57 | Matthias247 | and libuv is from api side really designed to provide a good basis for node and js |
20:57:02 | Demos | dom96, yeah, maybe a library that deals with it using staticExec and stuff, it would be fairly hacky |
20:57:05 | Matthias247 | and not necessarily for your use case |
20:58:01 | Matthias247 | you would have a start_read, some kind of read callback and an end_read. And not an async_read(buffer, size) |
20:58:40 | Araq | dom96: all we need is a 'gorge' section in a babel file |
20:59:04 | Araq | then babel can run custom nimrod install programs |
20:59:46 | * | CARAM joined #nimrod |
21:00:01 | dom96 | or just have a file called babelsetup.nim |
21:00:19 | Araq | yeah |
21:00:27 | Matthias247 | the uv source is more C Preprocessor stuff than anything else ;) |
21:00:39 | Araq | python's package manager does something like that iirc |
21:02:26 | Matthias247 | dom96: i'm currently fixing the TIpAddress exceptions stuff. Do you insist on more specific error messages? I thought about it myself - but came to the conclusion that I like a consistent error message better than telling the user what exactly is wrong. I think an error message shouldn't be tutorial about how a valid address should look like :) |
21:03:22 | dom96 | Matthias247: I would prefer to have a detailed error than a vague one. |
21:03:41 | Matthias247 | ok. Can do that |
21:03:41 | dom96 | If you make them detailed enough they will imply your current error anywa. |
21:03:43 | dom96 | *anyway |
21:03:51 | Araq | Matthias247: it sucks to translate exception messages into more detailed error messages. nobody does it. |
21:05:10 | Demos | well then we can have a nimrod library for compileing software with CMAKE |
21:05:44 | Matthias247 | Araq: I ususally just crash and then I'm happy to read the message in the stack trace :) |
21:08:35 | seubert | what do y'all use as editors for nimrod |
21:08:49 | dom96 | Aporia! |
21:08:59 | Matthias247 | sublime text with NimLime |
21:09:02 | Araq | is cmake that "we can't write parsers so you have to use whitespace before semicolons" thing? |
21:09:23 | seubert | dom96: ah haha :D |
21:09:45 | Araq | seubert: Aporia! |
21:10:20 | flaviu | seubert: Vim |
21:10:50 | seubert | good to see there is a variety of usages |
21:13:16 | * | brson joined #nimrod |
21:13:46 | Demos | Araq, ... no |
21:13:54 | Demos | the syntax is kinda ugly |
21:14:02 | Demos | started LIKE FORTRAN WITH CAPS |
21:15:11 | EXetoC | dom96: nimrod source file for what? is this still about external dependencies? |
21:16:17 | Araq | EXetoC: yes |
21:16:56 | Araq | we could support .bat/.sh scripts but then that's not portable so we should support nimrod "scripts" instead |
21:17:57 | * | shodan45 joined #nimrod |
21:18:19 | Matthias247 | dom96: made an update |
21:20:50 | EXetoC | Araq: what would it do? |
21:21:32 | Araq | EXetoC: check that your C compiler supports 'memcpy' |
21:21:49 | Araq | check that this computer has a CPU ... OK |
21:23:06 | dom96 | "can you see this? Hey human, please verify that you can see this so that I know that we have a working display!" |
21:23:11 | dom96 | Matthias247: thanks |
21:25:07 | EXetoC | really? I thought you meant just things like gtk |
21:25:17 | * | freddy3 joined #nimrod |
21:25:25 | Araq | hi freddy3 welcome |
21:25:48 | freddy3 | thanks |
21:26:05 | Araq | don't thank me, I'm just the greeting bot |
21:26:08 | EXetoC | anyway, I suppose you could have interfaces for common package formats, in which case you could add information about "external" deps for various platforms |
21:26:15 | dom96 | Matthias247: I'll pull it. But next time please make sure your lines don't exceed 80 chars. |
21:26:34 | Demos | you can point CMake at a git repo and have it download, build, and install into a user-provided prefix |
21:26:46 | Matthias247 | dom96: ok. Didn't know whether there was a policy |
21:27:00 | Demos | I use it so I can checkout my c++ project do a new computer and just say make deps and have everything set up |
21:27:04 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel cf43130 Matthias Einwag [+0 ±1 -0]: Added a IpAddress structure to the net module |
21:27:04 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel e0692fc Matthias Einwag [+0 ±1 -0]: Use character ranges from strutils. |
21:27:04 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel 35d9be1 Matthias Einwag [+0 ±1 -0]: $ for TIpAddress now prints in the recommended format |
21:27:04 | NimBot | Araq/Nimrod devel 09a5a50 Matthias Einwag [+0 ±1 -0]: raise exceptions through newException |
21:27:04 | NimBot | 2 more commits. |
21:27:07 | Matthias247 | dom96: And I'm still unsure where I can break lines with nimrod and where not |
21:27:39 | Araq | Matthias247: after ',' and binary operators and ( [ { |
21:27:51 | Demos | Araq, what about ; |
21:27:52 | Araq | that's the rule of thumb |
21:28:01 | Matthias247 | Araq: ok thx. And how should I indent in the next line? |
21:28:14 | Matthias247 | 2 more spaces or same level or doesn't matter? |
21:28:30 | Araq | 2 more spaces, same level won't work |
21:28:37 | EXetoC | deb, rpm etc |
21:28:48 | Araq | and Demos is right after ';' too of course |
21:28:56 | Matthias247 | ok |
21:29:10 | Demos | EXetoC, I dont know how well deb and rpm support installing into a non-root prefix |
21:30:45 | EXetoC | Demos: does it matter? I'm referring to non-nimrod deps |
21:31:31 | Demos | I mean not really, but if we support deb/rpm we would be installing locally, otherwise we sould just call the package manager |
21:32:23 | EXetoC | yes that should work |
21:32:35 | dom96 | Araq: I usually find it tempting to indent the next line to align with the params of the previous line, if the previous line is a proc declaration or a proc call. |
21:32:38 | dom96 | Is that bad? |
21:32:54 | Araq | no I do the same, sometimes |
21:33:26 | EXetoC | I do that only rarely |
21:34:01 | * | Araq notices the recent blog post didn't raise complaints about the syntax |
21:34:37 | * | Araq thinks he now knows what the mainstream wants :P |
21:34:45 | EXetoC | well, not for procs |
21:35:36 | Araq | Demos: what do you know about OpenCL/GPU programming? |
21:35:59 | Demos | very little, I have never worked in OpenCL or CUDA |
21:36:09 | Araq | ok too bad |
21:36:22 | Matthias247 | Araq: I don't think the reddit and hn users are "mainstream" developers ;) |
21:36:38 | * | Endy quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
21:37:29 | Demos | Right, but we are not going to be popular with mainstream developers until we are actually better for their domains. We need to stableize |
21:38:04 | Matthias247 | yes, you have to get some reputation at the "freaks" so that it spreads further :) |
21:38:38 | Matthias247 | (or you have to get a big company that uses it) |
21:40:25 | * | flaviu quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
21:40:55 | Araq | Demos: I'm with you. we need stability. |
21:41:24 | Demos | but even then you need to be stable and better than what people are using for the domains you are targetting. |
21:42:21 | Demos | Look at Go: Not a very interesting language but they were able to get it done really fast, and get tools out. And it is better than C++ and Java for server stuff (probably, I know little about web programming) |
21:42:47 | EXetoC | dom96: I just think it gets in the way of the important stuff |
21:43:08 | Araq | Demos: yes, I know |
21:43:14 | EXetoC | and sometimes you have to re-indent in quite a few places as a result of renaming |
21:43:24 | Matthias247 | Demos: I'm not even sure that it's better. But they are good at persuading that they are ;) |
21:43:47 | Matthias247 | and the thing about stability and tools(!) is absolutely true |
21:44:36 | Araq | Go also has google behind it |
21:44:39 | Demos | it is simpler, if I was a python or ruby programmer and I needed more speed Go would be reasonable, not having to learn c++ is a good thing. Go is just /smaller/ |
21:44:44 | Demos | also true |
21:45:04 | Matthias247 | anything without a proper IDE, debugger and package system won't have a chance by now |
21:45:12 | Araq | and they announced it when there were 3 fulltime devs working on it already |
21:45:13 | EXetoC | Matthias247: most people probably just want to get things done, so yeah |
21:45:17 | Matthias247 | but nimrod is already very good here |
21:45:26 | Araq | *3 fulltime devs* |
21:45:26 | EXetoC | and last time I checked, quite a few people wrote code for money :> |
21:45:31 | Demos | Matthias247, I agree, although a custom IDE is overkill |
21:45:43 | Araq | how many fulltime devs does nimrod have? |
21:45:47 | Araq | 0. |
21:46:08 | Matthias247 | Demos: yes, you don't need that. Dart uses Eclipse. That's fine |
21:46:33 | Araq | that's the major problem we have. everyting else is just irrelevant in comparison |
21:46:35 | fowl | there are infinite monkeys working around the clock on the compiler, what we lack is tests. |
21:46:46 | Matthias247 | Araq: I think they have even way more working on Dart. Guess >> 10 |
21:47:03 | * | cark quit (Write error: Connection reset by peer) |
21:47:21 | Araq | fowl: we have over 600 tests. |
21:47:25 | renesac | [17:07:05] <Araq> speaking on which ... I plan to rename EInvalidValue to InvalidValueError etc. <-- why the "Error" suffix? It can only appear when raised or catch, so it is obviously an error. The suffix is redundant |
21:47:26 | * | cark joined #nimrod |
21:48:06 | Trixar_za | Who cares? True developers don't give a damn, hobbiest like me don't care either. It's only lazy dumbass newbs that give a crap out things like an IDE |
21:48:09 | EXetoC | s/can't/usually does appear only/ |
21:48:11 | Trixar_za | But yeah - what do I know :| |
21:48:27 | Matthias247 | renesac: you can also use Exception types without raising them. I think it's ok. And consistent with what other languages do |
21:48:49 | Demos | True developers use ed. |
21:48:50 | Matthias247 | Trixar_za: I care ;) |
21:49:02 | Trixar_za | See previous statement :P |
21:49:18 | Demos | and vim and emacs are essentially IDEs |
21:49:33 | Trixar_za | I still suck at vim |
21:49:36 | Matthias247 | Trixar_za: I can decide in quite large software projects which tools may be used and which not |
21:49:57 | Matthias247 | Trixar_za: and things without an IDE (or other missing tools) would be kicked very soon from the list |
21:50:00 | Trixar_za | Who hasn't? |
21:50:21 | renesac | Matthias247, where else you would use those types? |
21:50:35 | Demos | Matthias247, to be fair people use C++ and although that has IDEs, they rarely work |
21:50:53 | Matthias247 | renesac: e.g. you can also deliver errors by callbacks |
21:51:08 | Araq | Trixar_za: I can easily work without IDEs but I prefer an IDE, if it works ;-) |
21:51:10 | renesac | I don't like this trade of short prefixes for long suffixes... |
21:51:22 | Matthias247 | Demos: they are far batter than no IDE. And visual studio and QT Creator work quite good |
21:51:25 | EXetoC | I do prefer prefixes |
21:51:48 | Matthias247 | renesac: that's what IDE's and autocompletion are for ;) |
21:52:09 | renesac | Matthias247, and it would be unclear if it didn't had the error suffix? |
21:52:12 | Trixar_za | Araq: True, but I've used too many text editors like geany to stop now :P |
21:52:18 | Demos | Matthias247, you have never used VS on a larger project. And Qt creator falls apart even faster. VAX is good though. Debugger support is supah important as well, but the only IDEs that really do that well are XCode and VS |
21:52:39 | EXetoC | because it simplifies looking things up in alphabetically sorted lists |
21:52:49 | renesac | I don't like languages that can only be used inside IDEs... |
21:52:58 | Araq | I still miss Delphi (5-6 that is) ... |
21:53:00 | renesac | and I like lines 80 characters long |
21:53:12 | EXetoC | renesac: 79? :pp |
21:53:19 | renesac | or 79 |
21:53:19 | renesac | yeah |
21:53:21 | Demos | it can also be hard to get nimrod projects supported in an IDE, since IDEs like to use their own build system, or assume that you use make or something |
21:53:28 | renesac | the divider is at 80 |
21:53:44 | Demos | I hear Delphi had fantastic tooling. |
21:53:48 | EXetoC | yeah me too. people just want to make things wider and wider just because widescreen monitors are getting more common |
21:53:59 | Trixar_za | hehe - tooling |
21:54:38 | Matthias247 | Demos: nothing > 100kloc I admit. And the older VS break quite fast. But with 2012 I had no problems |
21:54:38 | Matthias247 | the problem is with c++, because it has no standard build system. So every IDE integrates it's own |
21:54:47 | Trixar_za | But isn't Qt Creator more RAD than IDE? |
21:55:06 | dom96 | renesac: Errors like "EOS" need the "Error" suffix. |
21:55:26 | Demos | yeah, although many other languages don't have a standard build tool either |
21:55:29 | Trixar_za | Oh hey dom96 |
21:55:30 | Demos | Trixar_za, nope |
21:55:31 | Araq | Demos: indeed. best IDE ever. fast as hell and yet full of features. the debugger also was a decade ahead of what others had. |
21:55:41 | dom96 | Which coincidentally will not clash with the osError proc. |
21:55:42 | EXetoC | dom96: I think prefixes are better |
21:55:47 | Demos | wait which one, XCode or VS |
21:55:48 | dom96 | *now |
21:55:51 | Matthias247 | QT Creator is probably the best c++ IDE I've used |
21:55:54 | dom96 | hi Trixar_za, long time no speak. |
21:55:54 | Trixar_za | Never actually used it and I've coded interfaces in pyQT and PySide :\ |
21:56:19 | Matthias247 | apart from the debugger, which is super-slow |
21:56:19 | Trixar_za | Yeah, it's been a while - how is your editor doing? |
21:56:25 | * | zielmicha quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
21:57:56 | * | zielmicha joined #nimrod |
21:58:38 | Matthias247 | And I still have the opinion that programming with a staticly typed language and a good IDE is much faster and less error-prone than with javascript or any other dynamic thing |
21:58:59 | Matthias247 | Half of the time you only have to press ctrl+space and the IDE codes for you ;) |
21:59:40 | Trixar_za | Yeah, that's not improving my opinion of your coding ability :P |
22:00:10 | Matthias247 | lol |
22:00:43 | EXetoC | Matthias247: yeah, just use variants or something if necessary |
22:01:47 | dom96 | Trixar_za: Not doing very well. Kind of losing hope when it comes to GTK |
22:02:06 | Matthias247 | Trixar_za: It has nothing to do with a being a better or worse coder. Good tools only help you to get things done faster. And not having to remember about every function and every parameter in gigantic libraries |
22:02:26 | Trixar_za | dom96: I know the feeling. Qt just seems so much better - except with WebkitQt of course. |
22:03:11 | EXetoC | dom96: how so? |
22:03:13 | Trixar_za | Never had that problem, but then again I have a pretty good memory |
22:03:28 | Trixar_za | Same excuse to why I forget to comment |
22:03:39 | EXetoC | I know you hade some issues with resizing, but that's probably not the only one |
22:05:06 | dom96 | EXetoC: I constatly have issues with almost everything. |
22:06:02 | Matthias247 | and being fucked up through every typo (like you are in JS) is not what you desire |
22:06:02 | Matthias247 | I'm doing production code in 8 languages and frameworks. There's no chance I can remember all the libraries |
22:06:02 | Matthias247 | so you either use an IDE or you are browsing the library references most of your work time |
22:07:28 | dom96 | EXetoC: GTK feels like an endless struggle sometimes. |
22:07:51 | renesac | Araq, does the 'resize()' proc initialize the extra memory by default? I should, for consistency with 'create()' |
22:07:56 | EXetoC | dom96: you think some of these issues can be wrapped away? :> |
22:08:15 | dom96 | EXetoC: What do you mean by 'wrapped away'? |
22:08:26 | Araq | renesac: indeed it does unless 'realloc' is mapped to C's realloc |
22:08:37 | renesac | hum, good |
22:08:46 | renesac | and there is no resizeu()? |
22:09:02 | Araq | no |
22:09:16 | Araq | I guess we should add that |
22:09:17 | EXetoC | dom96: with a.. wrapper |
22:09:30 | EXetoC | rather than just a binding |
22:09:44 | renesac | yeah (thought I would prefer as an optional argument as I said earlier) |
22:09:44 | Demos | I have heard GTK is pretty bad, it takes the "lets reinvent c++ in c and totally ignore everything that makes C good" |
22:10:12 | EXetoC | as in GObject and stuff? |
22:10:35 | dom96 | EXetoC: oh. I doubt it. |
22:10:54 | dom96 | EXetoC: Most of the issues stem from GTK's limitations. |
22:11:39 | dom96 | It took me over 2 years to figure out why scrolling a text view to a specific line sometimes works and sometimes doesn't |
22:12:00 | dom96 | And after fixing it I'm still not entirely sure about the exact reason why the fix is necessary. |
22:12:06 | EXetoC | With or without asking anyone? |
22:12:26 | dom96 | Oh yeah, the only reason I finally figured it out was thanks to someone on GIMPNet. |
22:12:26 | EXetoC | ^_^ |
22:12:41 | dom96 | http://picheta.me/articles/2013/08/gtk-plus--a-method-to-guarantee-scrolling.html |
22:12:50 | dom96 | The issue was so important to me that I wrote about it on my blog :P |
22:12:52 | Demos | I really do wonder what a really well designed C windowing tool would look like |
22:13:11 | Araq | iup? |
22:15:32 | Demos | hm, looks pretty nice |
22:17:18 | Demos | there is also elementary, not sure how good that is though |
22:18:20 | Araq | "Known Issue (Compiler): when building with Open Watcom the additional controls crash. When you add debug information to the main IUP library the problem solves. We tried to track down this error but it does not occurs with debug information and our attempts without debug does not gives any results. So the IUP main library for Watcom is now distributed with debug information. (since 3.0)" |
22:19:17 | Araq | so it doesn't work with open watcom. big deal. what do you mean "open watcom itself hardly works and is dead"? |
22:19:30 | Demos | never mind then |
22:19:37 | * | Matthias247 quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
22:19:53 | * | Matthias247 joined #nimrod |
22:20:20 | * | Araq is waiting for a macosx port of IUP. For 5 years now. |
22:20:49 | * | eigenlicht quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
22:23:39 | EXetoC | oh -.- |
22:24:29 | Demos | I was looking at the <control.h> and <draw.h> man pages from plan9, they look good. I have been thinking about how GUI libs are typically pretty classic OOP, but if you have callbacks I hardly see why that is needed |
22:26:49 | * | zielmicha quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
22:27:14 | * | zielmicha joined #nimrod |
22:27:39 | Mat3 | Demos: Take a look at FLTK |
22:27:53 | EXetoC | Araq: OS X is mentioned a few times on the website |
22:28:15 | Demos | Mat3, FLTK code looks good, but we are talking about C GUI libraries |
22:28:18 | Demos | FLTK is c++ |
22:29:10 | Araq | the problem with IUP and the like is that "simple" doesn't cut it and most of the time you need a crticial complex component |
22:29:44 | Araq | like a source editor widget |
22:29:51 | EXetoC | I suspected that. So, are there any decent alternatives? |
22:29:54 | EXetoC | dom96? |
22:30:01 | EXetoC | right |
22:30:02 | Araq | or like a browser "widgets" |
22:30:05 | Demos | well Qt, and KParts |
22:30:18 | Demos | but again C++, I do like Qt though |
22:30:21 | Demos | hard to wrap |
22:30:59 | Araq | I think c2nim plus perhaps a few minor patches is up to the task |
22:31:00 | EXetoC | we do have a C++ generator, but my guess would be that it still requires a lot of work |
22:31:12 | Araq | to wrap Qt |
22:31:20 | EXetoC | really? amazing |
22:31:50 | Araq | EXetoC: well c2nim supports c++ now |
22:34:39 | BitPuffin | err |
22:34:49 | BitPuffin | if c2nim can barely handle C how could it possibly handle Qt |
22:36:00 | Mat3 | Demos: TK (without TCL) ? |
22:36:35 | dom96 | EXetoC: My bet is still on webkit. |
22:38:22 | dom96 | It allows for the greatest flexibility and people nowadays don't give a shit about performance. |
22:38:52 | dom96 | As is the case with Atom. |
22:39:04 | Araq | BitPuffin: "barely handle C"? it handles C just fine, you need to edit the header. wooohooo big deal. |
22:39:08 | dom96 | It not only uses webkit but also is written in Node.js IIRC. |
22:39:54 | Mat3 | my personal favourite would be EFL (Enlightement Foundation Libraries) |
22:40:19 | Araq | Mat3: Tk without TCL is only possible in theory last time I checked. |
22:40:26 | Matthias247 | it is. But I think it's major performance problem comes more from the html rendering than from node.js logic code |
22:40:32 | EXetoC | dom96: that's fine as long as you have the ability to choose. as is the case with Qt for example |
22:40:42 | Araq | there are no docs on how to do that |
22:40:43 | EXetoC | but I can't say I know too much about it |
22:42:36 | Mat3 | Araq: Good to know, thanks |
22:43:09 | EXetoC | Mat3: All I know is that Enlightenment, which seemed like a solid product, is powered by it |
22:43:48 | EXetoC | let's see if the documentation is any good |
22:44:56 | * | CARAM quit (Remote host closed the connection) |
22:46:07 | Araq | good night guys |
22:46:10 | * | Demos_ joined #nimrod |
22:46:17 | EXetoC | bb |
22:46:45 | * | psquid joined #nimrod |
22:47:35 | Demos_ | I looked at EFL a bit, it came across as very macroey and kinda ugly |
22:48:32 | Demos_ | the other issue with wrapping qt is moc, but I guess we could just clone moc with macros |
22:48:34 | EXetoC | :< |
22:48:46 | Mat3 | ciao Araq |
22:54:10 | Mat3 | EXetoC: http://docs.enlightenment.org/auto/evas/edje_main.html <- can't see any ugly concepts beside the C syntax |
22:57:33 | Mat3 | this library uses a formal description and so abstracting the interface from GUI construction |
22:58:34 | Mat3 | which is in my opinion a nice (and very old) concept |
23:03:01 | Mat3 | ciao |
23:03:15 | * | Mat3 quit (Quit: Verlassend) |
23:04:43 | * | darkf joined #nimrod |
23:19:22 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
23:24:30 | BitPuffin | Araq: yes but that counts as barely |
23:24:33 | BitPuffin | if it handles C |
23:24:38 | BitPuffin | you shouldn't have to edit it |
23:25:10 | dom96 | BitPuffin: Did you see my awesome async stuff?! |
23:25:18 | * | flaviu quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
23:26:43 | * | flaviu joined #nimrod |
23:30:20 | dom96 | macros.nim(506, 12) Error: invalid type: 'void' :( |
23:37:49 | * | freddy3 left #nimrod (#nimrod) |
23:44:34 | * | Demos quit (*.net *.split) |
23:44:37 | * | Demos_ quit (*.net *.split) |
23:44:38 | * | cark quit (*.net *.split) |
23:46:45 | * | noam__ joined #nimrod |
23:48:48 | * | Demos joined #nimrod |
23:51:09 | * | brson_ joined #nimrod |
23:55:54 | * | psquid quit (*.net *.split) |
23:55:55 | * | brson quit (*.net *.split) |
23:55:57 | * | noam_ quit (*.net *.split) |
23:55:57 | * | vendethiel quit (*.net *.split) |
23:55:58 | * | dom96 quit (*.net *.split) |
23:56:04 | * | dom96 joined #nimrod |
23:58:04 | * | noam_ joined #nimrod |